Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36809746›Full record

ArticleJournal of psychiatric research2023

Using the 5C model to understand COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy across a National and South Carolina sample.

Caitlin Rancher, Angela D Moreland, Daniel W Smith, Vickey Cornelison, Michael G Schmidt, John Boyle, James Dayton, Dean G Kilpatrick

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of psychiatric research, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Measles is Just a Harbinger.Delaware journal of public health · 2025
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Caitlin RancherNational Crime Victims Research and Treatment Center, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, USA. Electronic address: rancher@musc.edu.
Angela D MorelandNational Crime Victims Research and Treatment Center, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, USA.
Daniel W SmithNational Crime Victims Research and Treatment Center, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, USA.
Vickey CornelisonNational Crime Victims Research and Treatment Center, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, USA.
Michael G SchmidtDepartment of Microbiology and Immunology, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, USA.
John BoyleICF International, Rockville, MD, 20850, USA.
James DaytonICF International, Rockville, MD, 20850, USA.
Dean G KilpatrickNational Crime Victims Research and Treatment Center, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Vaccine hesitancy is a serious threat to global health; however, significant COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy exists throughout the United States. The 5C model, which postulates five person-level determinants for vaccine hesitancy - confidence, complacency, constraints, risk calculation, and collective responsibility - provides one theoretical way of understanding COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy. The present study examined the effects of these 5C drivers of vaccine behavior on early vaccine adoption and vaccine intentions above and beyond theoretically salient demographic characteristics and compared these associations across a National sample (n = 1634) and a statewide sample from South Carolina (n = 784) - a state with documented low levels of COVID-19 vaccination uptake. This study used quantitative and qualitative data collected in October 2020 to January 2021 from the MFour-Mobile Research Panel, a large, representative non-probability sample of adult smartphone users. Overall, the South Carolina sample reported lower COVID-19 vaccine intentions and higher levels of 5C barriers to vaccine uptake compared to the National sample. Findings further indicated that both demographic characteristics (race) and certain drivers of vaccine behavior (confidence and collective responsibility) are associated with vaccine trust and intentions across samples above and beyond other variables. Qualitative data indicated that COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy was driven by fears about the quick vaccine development, limited research, and potential side effects. Although there are some limitations to the cross-sectional survey data, the present study offers valuable insight into factors associated with early COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy across the United States.

Indexed as

COVID-19Drug-Related Side Effects and Adverse ReactionsAdultCOVID-19 VaccinesCross-Sectional StudiesHumansSouth CarolinaCOVID-19 VaccinesCOVID-19COVID-19 vaccinationVaccine acceptanceVaccine hesitancy

Identifiers

PMID36809746
PMCPMC9933856

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.