SynthesisJournal of cancer research and clinical oncology2023
Risk mapping of lung cancer: a comprehensive appraisal of published meta-analyses incorporating Mendelian randomization studies.
Synthesis in Journal of cancer research and clinical oncology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
- Branched-chain amino acids and risk of lung cancer: insights from mendelian randomization and NHANES III.Journal of thoracic disease · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
30 authors at 8 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
introductionA comprehensive appraisal of published meta-analyses incorporating Mendelian randomization studies was performed to map the different risk factors and assess the causality for lung cancer.
methodsSystematic reviews and meta-analyses of observational and interventional studies were reviewed based on PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library. Mendelian randomization analyses were conducted to validate the causal associations of those various exposures with lung cancer using summary statistics from 10 genome-wide association studies (GWAS) consortia and other GWAS databases in MR-Base platform.
resultsIn the review of meta-analyses, 105 risk factors associated with lung cancer were identified from 93 articles. It was found that 72 risk factors were nominally significant (P < 0.05) associated with lung cancer. Mendelian randomization analyses were performed to analyze 36 exposures based on 551 SNPs and 4,944,052 individuals, finding that 3 exposures had a consistent risk/protective effect on lung cancer with the results of the meta-analysis. In Mendelian randomization anaylses, smoking (OR 1.44, 95% CI 1.18-1.75; P = 0.001) and blood copper (OR 1.14, 95% CI 1.01-1.29; P = 0.039) significantly associated with increased risk of lung cancer, whereas aspirin use (OR 0.67, 95% CI 0.50-0.89; P = 0.006) showed protective effects.
conclusionThis study mapped putative associations of risk factors for lung cancer, revealing the causal hazard effect of smoking, blood copper, and the protective effect of aspirin use in the development of lung cancer. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRY: This study is registered with PROSPERO (CRD42020159082).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.