Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36809468›Full record

ArticleJAMA network open2023

Using Haplotype-Based Artificial Intelligence to Evaluate SARS-CoV-2 Novel Variants and Mutations.

Lue Ping Zhao, Seth Cohen, Michael Zhao, Margaret Madeleine, Thomas H Payne, Terry P Lybrand, Daniel E Geraghty, Keith R Jerome, Lawrence Corey

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JAMA network open, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 43% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Lue Ping ZhaoPublic Health Sciences Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, Washington.
Seth CohenVaccine and Infectious Disease Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, Washington.
Michael ZhaoQuantFu Inc, Boston, Massachusetts.
Margaret MadeleinePublic Health Sciences Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, Washington.
Thomas H PayneDepartment of Medicine, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle.
Terry P LybrandQuintepa Computing LLC, Nashville, Tennessee.
Daniel E GeraghtyClinical Research Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, Washington.
Keith R JeromeVaccine and Infectious Disease Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, Washington.
Lawrence CoreyVaccine and Infectious Disease Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, Washington.
Fred Hutch Cancer Center · USUniversity of Washington · USNashville Oncology Associates · USQuantlab (United States) · US

Funding

LOC: HIV Vaccine Trials NetworkUM1AI068614 · NIAID · FRED HUTCHINSON CANCER RESEARCH CENTER · PI Dan H. Barouch, Lawrence Corey · 2011 to 2026
$1175.6M
SDMC: HIV Vaccine Trials NetworkUM1AI068635 · NIAID · FRED HUTCHINSON CANCER RESEARCH CENTER · PI Peter B. Gilbert, Yunda Huang · 2011 to 2026
$385.9M
PPE RequestS10AI174104 · NIAID · FRED HUTCHINSON CANCER CENTER · PI COREY, LAWRENCE · 2023 to 2023
$1.4M
NIAID NIH HHS S10 AI174104NIAID NIH HHS UM1 AI068614NIAID NIH HHS UM1 AI068635
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: Earlier detection of emerging novel SARS-COV-2 variants is important for public health surveillance of potential viral threats and for earlier prevention research. Artificial intelligence may facilitate early detection of SARS-CoV2 emerging novel variants based on variant-specific mutation haplotypes and, in turn, be associated with enhanced implementation of risk-stratified public health prevention strategies. Objective: To develop a haplotype-based artificial intelligence (HAI) model for identifying novel variants, including mixture variants (MVs) of known variants and new variants with novel mutations. Design, Setting, and Participants: This cross-sectional study used serially observed viral genomic sequences globally (prior to March 14, 2022) to train and validate the HAI model and used it to identify variants arising from a prospective set of viruses from March 15 to May 18, 2022. Main Outcomes and Measures: Viral sequences, collection dates, and locations were subjected to statistical learning analysis to estimate variant-specific core mutations and haplotype frequencies, which were then used to construct an HAI model to identify novel variants. Results: Through training on more than 5 million viral sequences, an HAI model was built, and its identification performance was validated on an independent validation set of more than 5 million viruses. Its identification performance was assessed on a prospective set of 344 901 viruses. In addition to achieving an accuracy of 92.8% (95% CI within 0.1%), the HAI model identified 4 Omicron MVs (Omicron-Alpha, Omicron-Delta, Omicron-Epsilon, and Omicron-Zeta), 2 Delta MVs (Delta-Kappa and Delta-Zeta), and 1 Alpha-Epsilon MV, among which Omicron-Epsilon MVs were most frequent (609/657 MVs [92.7%]). Furthermore, the HAI model found that 1699 Omicron viruses had unidentifiable variants given that these variants acquired novel mutations. Lastly, 524 variant-unassigned and variant-unidentifiable viruses carried 16 novel mutations, 8 of which were increasing in prevalence percentages as of May 2022. Conclusions and Relevance: In this cross-sectional study, an HAI model found SARS-COV-2 viruses with MV or novel mutations in the global population, which may require closer examination and monitoring. These results suggest that HAI may complement phylogenic variant assignment, providing additional insights into emerging novel variants in the population.

Indexed as

Artificial IntelligenceCOVID-19Cross-Sectional StudiesHaplotypesHumansMutationProspective StudiesRNA, ViralSARS-CoV-2RNA, Viral

Identifiers

PMID36809468
PMCPMC9945077
OpenAlexW4321445817

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.