ArticleArchives of dermatological research2023
Immune checkpoint inhibitor-induced vitiligo in cancer patients: characterization and management.
Article in Archives of dermatological research, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
- Vitiligo-like Lesions as a Predictor of Response to Immunotherapy in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: Comprehensive Review and Case Series from a University Center.Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.) · 2024Pooled it
- Drug-induced vitiligo: a real-world pharmacovigilance analysis of the FAERS database.PloS one · 2025Article
- From immunological mechanisms to targeted therapies: a bibliometric analysis of vitiligo treatment research (2005-2025).Frontiers in immunology · 2025Review
- Defining D-irAEs: consensus-based disease definitions for the diagnosis of dermatologic adverse events from immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy.Journal for immunotherapy of cancer · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study highlights the range of non-melanoma cancers where ICI-induced vitiligo can be present and challenges the exclusivity of this phenomenon to melanoma. We believe our manuscript will encourage awareness in our colleagues and stimulate interest in further studies to elucidate the mechanisms of ICI-induced vitiligo in both melanoma and non-melanoma cancers, and to understand whether this phenomenon holds the same positive prognostic value in both cancer groups. This is a retrospective cohort study from a single-institution's electronic medical record for cancer patients treated with ICIs who subsequently developed vitiligo. We identified 151 patients with ICI-induced vitiligo, 19 (12.6%) non-melanoma and 132 (77.4%) melanoma patients. Time to onset of vitiligo was nearly doubled in the non-melanoma cohort, however, this is confounded by possible delayed diagnosis or under reporting of this asymptomatic condition in patients who do not regularly receive skin exams. The majority of patients had a stable course of vitiligo with 91.4% receiving no treatment in this largely Caucasian cohort. Two patients with non-melanoma cancers and Fitzpatrick type IV or above skin received treatment with narrowband ultraviolet B light therapy and topical steroids with near-complete response. This study highlights the occurrence of ICI-induced vitiligo in a variety of non-melanoma cancers, where skin of color patients will be more prevalent and the need for treatment will potentially be more urgent. Further study is needed to elucidate the mechanism of ICI-induced vitiligo and determine if non-melanoma cancers have the same association between vitiligo and increased tumor response.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.