Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36809294›Full record

ArticleJMIR formative research2023

Leveraging Mobile Phone Sensors, Machine Learning, and Explainable Artificial Intelligence to Predict Imminent Same-Day Binge-drinking Events to Support Just-in-time Adaptive Interventions: Algorithm Development and Validation Study.

Sang Won Bae, Brian Suffoletto, Tongze Zhang, Tammy Chung, Melik Ozolcer, Mohammad Rahul Islam, Anind K Dey

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR formative research, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02918565 (Mechanisms for Alcohol Treatment Change [MATCH] Study), which is not on this map. Cited by 24 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
7.4field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02918565 nacompletednot on this map

Mechanisms for Alcohol Treatment Change [MATCH] Study

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of PittsburghRan2016 to 2021Enrolled1,131ConditionsAlcohol ConsumptionArmsDrinking Cognition Feedback (DCF), Alcohol Risk Feedback (ARF), Adaptive Goal Support (AGS), COMBO
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Observational
  6. Comparing training window selection methods for prediction in non-stationary time series.The British journal of mathematical and statistical psychology · 2026
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Daily self-control demands and loss of control over drinking: The moderating role of trait impulsivity and peer exposure.Psychology of addictive behaviors : journal of the Society of Psychologists in Addictive Behaviors · 2026
    Article
  9. Review
  10. Observational
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Observational
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Sang Won BaeHuman-Computer Interaction and Human-Centered AI Systems Lab, AI for Healthcare Lab, School of Systems and Enterprises, Stevens Institute of Technology, Hoboken, NJ, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2047-1358
Brian SuffolettoDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9628-5260
Tongze ZhangHuman-Computer Interaction and Human-Centered AI Systems Lab, AI for Healthcare Lab, School of Systems and Enterprises, Stevens Institute of Technology, Hoboken, NJ, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3375-7136
Tammy ChungInstitute for Health, Healthcare Policy and Aging Research, Rutgers University, Newark, NJ, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1527-2792
Melik OzolcerHuman-Computer Interaction and Human-Centered AI Systems Lab, AI for Healthcare Lab, School of Systems and Enterprises, Stevens Institute of Technology, Hoboken, NJ, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4251-0204
Mohammad Rahul IslamHuman-Computer Interaction and Human-Centered AI Systems Lab, AI for Healthcare Lab, School of Systems and Enterprises, Stevens Institute of Technology, Hoboken, NJ, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3601-0078
Anind K DeyInformation School, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3004-0770
Stevens Institute of Technology · USRutgers, The State University of New Jersey · USStanford University · USUniversity of Washington · US

Funding

MECHANISMS OF CHANGE FOR AN EFFECTIVE ALCOHOL TEXT MESSAGE INTERVENTIONR01AA023650 · NIAAA · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI CHUNG, TAMMY, SUFFOLETTO, BRIAN P · 2016 to 2020
$1.8M
Smartphone sensors to detect shifts toward healthy behavior during alcohol treatmentR21AA030153 · NIAAA · RUTGERS BIOMEDICAL AND HEALTH SCIENCES · PI CHUNG, TAMMY · 2022 to 2023
$456k
NIAAA NIH HHS R01 AA023650NIAAA NIH HHS R21 AA030153
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDigital just-in-time adaptive interventions can reduce binge-drinking events (BDEs; consuming ≥4 drinks for women and ≥5 drinks for men per occasion) in young adults but need to be optimized for timing and content. Delivering just-in-time support messages in the hours prior to BDEs could improve intervention impact.

objectiveWe aimed to determine the feasibility of developing a machine learning (ML) model to accurately predict future, that is, same-day BDEs 1 to 6 hours prior BDEs, using smartphone sensor data and to identify the most informative phone sensor features associated with BDEs on weekends and weekdays to determine the key features that explain prediction model performance.

methodsWe collected phone sensor data from 75 young adults (aged 21 to 25 years; mean 22.4, SD 1.9 years) with risky drinking behavior who reported their drinking behavior over 14 weeks. The participants in this secondary analysis were enrolled in a clinical trial. We developed ML models testing different algorithms (eg, extreme gradient boosting [XGBoost] and decision tree) to predict same-day BDEs (vs low-risk drinking events and non-drinking periods) using smartphone sensor data (eg, accelerometer and GPS). We tested various "prediction distance" time windows (more proximal: 1 hour; distant: 6 hours) from drinking onset. We also tested various analysis time windows (ie, the amount of data to be analyzed), ranging from 1 to 12 hours prior to drinking onset, because this determines the amount of data that needs to be stored on the phone to compute the model. Explainable artificial intelligence was used to explore interactions among the most informative phone sensor features contributing to the prediction of BDEs.

resultsThe XGBoost model performed the best in predicting imminent same-day BDEs, with 95% accuracy on weekends and 94.3% accuracy on weekdays (F

conclusionsWe demonstrated the feasibility and potential use of smartphone sensor data and ML for accurately predicting imminent (same-day) BDEs in young adults. The prediction model provides "windows of opportunity," and with the adoption of explainable artificial intelligence, we identified "key contributing features" to trigger just-in-time adaptive intervention prior to the onset of BDEs, which has the potential to reduce the likelihood of BDEs in young adults.

trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov NCT02918565; https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02918565.

Indexed as

alcohol consumptionBDEbehavioral prediction modelbinge-drinking eventexplainable artificial intelligenceJITAIsjust-in-time adaptive interventionsmachine learningmobile phonepassive sensingsmartphone sensorsXAI

Identifiers

PMID36809294
PMCPMC10196900
OpenAlexW4320507225

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.