ArticlePloS one2023
A numerical simulation method for pressure drop and normal air velocity of pleated filters during dust loading.
Article in PloS one, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Mechanism of interpleat channel blockage in pleated filters during dust loading.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Numerical Analysis of Indoor Air Characteristics and Window Screen Influence on Particulate Matter Dispersion in a Childcare Center Using Computational Fluid Dynamics.Environmental health insights · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Pressure drop is an important indicator that affects the filtration performance of the pleated filter, and the deposition of dust particles within the pleats is crucial to the evolution of the pressure drop. In this study, the pressure drop during PM10 loading process was investigated for a series of V-shaped and U-shaped filters with a pleat height of 20 mm and different pleat ratios (the ratio of pleat height to pleat width: α = 0.71-3.57). In the numerical simulations, numerical models suitable for different pleated geometries were obtained through experimental verification on the local air velocity. Then, assuming that the dust cake thickness is proportional to the normal air velocity of the filters, the variation of the pressure drop with the dust deposition is derived by means of successive numerical simulations. This simulation method saved a significant amount of CPU time required for the growth of dust cake. It was found that the relative average deviations between experimental and simulated pressure drops were 3.12% and 1.19% for V-shaped and U-shaped filters, respectively. Furthermore, it was found that under the same pleat ratio and the mass of dust deposition per unit area, both the pressure drop and unevenness of normal air velocity of the U-shaped filter were lower than the V-shaped filter. Therefore, the U-shaped filter is recommended due to its better filtration performance.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.