Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36808979›Full record

ArticleEnvironmental science & technology2023

Simple Management Changes Drastically Reduce Pig House Methane Emission in Combined Experimental and Modeling Study.

Frederik Rask Dalby, Michael Jørgen Hansen, Lise Bonne Guldberg, Sasha Daniel Hafner, Anders Feilberg

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Environmental science & technology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Frederik Rask DalbyDepartment of Biological and Chemical Engineering, Aarhus University, 8000-DK Aarhus N, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0003-2437-064X
Michael Jørgen HansenDepartment of Biological and Chemical Engineering, Aarhus University, 8000-DK Aarhus N, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0002-9929-674X
Lise Bonne GuldbergDepartment of Biological and Chemical Engineering, Aarhus University, 8000-DK Aarhus N, Denmark.
Sasha Daniel HafnerDepartment of Biological and Chemical Engineering, Aarhus University, 8000-DK Aarhus N, Denmark.
Anders FeilbergDepartment of Biological and Chemical Engineering, Aarhus University, 8000-DK Aarhus N, Denmark.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Reducing methane from livestock slurry is one of the quickest ways to counteract global warming. A straightforward strategy is to reduce slurry retention time inside pig houses by frequent transfer to outside storages, where temperature and therefore microbial activity are lower. We demonstrate three frequent slurry removal strategies in pig houses in a year-round continuous measurement campaign. Slurry funnels, slurry trays, and weekly flushing reduced slurry methane emission by 89, 81, and 53%, respectively. Slurry funnels and slurry trays reduced ammonia emission by 25-30%. An extended version of the anaerobic biodegradation model (ABM) was fitted and validated using barn measurements. It was then applied for predicting storage emission and shows that there is a risk of negating barn methane reductions due to increased emission from outside storage. Therefore, we recommend combining the removal strategies with anaerobic digestion pre-storage or storage mitigation technologies such as slurry acidification. However, even without storage mitigation technologies, predicted net methane reduction from pig houses and following outside storage was at least 30% for all slurry removal strategies.

Indexed as

ManureMethaneAmmoniaAnimalsGlobal WarmingNitrous OxideSwineAmmoniaManureMethaneNitrous Oxideemissionmanagementmethanemodelingpigsslurry

Identifiers

PMID36808979
PMCPMC9996816

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.