ArticleJournal of psychopathology and clinical science2023
Examining common and distinct contributions to the etiology of suicide attempt and reattempt.
Article in Journal of psychopathology and clinical science, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Leveraging Family Genetic Risk Scores to Understand the Etiology of Suicidal Behaviors and Their Associations With Psychiatric Disorders.Acta psychiatrica Scandinavica · 2026Article
- The protective effect of pregnancy on risk for suicide attempt in a Swedish national cohort.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- A new method for dealing with collider bias in the PWP model for recurrent events in randomized controlled trials.BMC medical research methodology · 2025Article
- A Swedish population-based study to evaluate the usefulness of resting heart rate in the prediction of suicidal behavior among males.Suicide & life-threatening behavior · 2024Article
- Risk of suicidal behavior as a function of alcohol use disorder typologies: A Swedish population-based study.Addiction (Abingdon, England) · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
This study examined the extent to which the genetic and environmental characteristics of having a first versus a second suicide attempt (SA) are common or specific. We evaluated the direct pathway between these phenotypes and the role of specific risk factors. From Swedish national registries, two subsamples of individuals born between 1960 and 1980 were selected (1,227,287 twin-sibling pairs and 2,265,796 unrelated individuals). First, a twin-sibling model was fit to evaluate the genetic and environmental risk factors related to first and second SA. The model also included a direct path between first and second SA. Second, an extended Cox proportional hazards model (PWP) was used to evaluate the risk factors related to first versus second SA. In the twin-sibling model, suicide reattempt was strongly related to first SA (β = 0.72). The total heritability for the second SA was estimated at 0.48, with 45.80% unique to this second SA. The total environmental influence for the second SA was 0.51, with 50.59% unique. In the PWP model, we found that childhood environment, psychiatric disorders, and selected stressful life events were related to both first and second SA, potentially reflecting common genetic and environmental factors. Other stressful life events were associated with first but not second SA in the multivariable model, suggesting their specificity in explaining the first occurrence of SA but not its recurrence. Specific risk factors related to second SA need to be further explored. These findings have important implications for describing the pathways toward suicidal behavior and identifying individuals at risk for multiple SA. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2023 APA, all rights reserved).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.