ArticleMicrobial biotechnology2023
Engineering resource allocation in artificially minimized cells: Is genome reduction the best strategy?
Article in Microbial biotechnology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Hierarchical metabolic engineering for rewiring cellular metabolism.FEMS microbiology reviews · 2025Review
- Enhancing Escherichia coli abiotic stress resistance through ornithine lipid formation.Applied microbiology and biotechnology · 2024Article
- Synergistic investigation of natural and synthetic C1-trophic microorganisms to foster a circular carbon economy.Nature communications · 2023Review
- Engineering resource allocation in artificially minimized cells: Is genome reduction the best strategy?Microbial biotechnology · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The elimination of the expression of cellular functions that are not needed in a certain well-defined artificial environment, such as those used in industrial production facilities, has been the goal of many cellular minimization projects. The generation of a minimal cell with reduced burden and less host-function interactions has been pursued as a tool to improve microbial production strains. In this work, we analysed two cellular complexity reduction strategies: genome and proteome reduction. With the aid of an absolute proteomics data set and a genome-scale model of metabolism and protein expression (ME-model), we quantitatively assessed the difference of reducing genome to the correspondence of reducing proteome. We compare the approaches in terms of energy consumption, defined in ATP equivalents. We aim to show what is the best strategy for improving resource allocation in minimized cells. Our results show that genome reduction by length is not proportional to reducing resource use. When we normalize calculated energy savings, we show that strains with the larger calculated proteome reduction show the largest resource use reduction. Furthermore, we propose that reducing highly expressed proteins should be the target as the translation of a gene uses most of the energy. The strategies proposed here should guide cell design when the aim of a project is to reduce the maximum amount or cellular resources.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.