ArticleNeurogastroenterology and motility2023
An artificial intelligence platform provides an accurate interpretation of esophageal motility from Functional Lumen Imaging Probe Panometry studies.
Article in Neurogastroenterology and motility, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- SAGES-EAES systematic review and meta-analysis for the use of FLIP/impedance planimetry in the surgical work-up and management of GERD, achalasia, and gastroparesis.Surgical endoscopy · 2026Pooled it
- Artificial Intelligence in Gastrointestinal Motility Diagnostics: A Systematic Review.Neurogastroenterology and motility · 2026Pooled it
- AI in Esophageal Motility Disorders: Systematic Review of High-Resolution Manometry Studies.Journal of medical Internet research · 2025Pooled it
- Artificial Intelligence for Diagnosis of Esophageal Manometry: A Narrative Review.Current gastroenterology reports · 2026Review
- Accuracy of Novice Raters for Esophageal Motility Classifications Using Functional Lumen Imaging Probe Panometry.Neurogastroenterology and motility · 2026Article
- Artificial intelligence for surgical management of benign esophageal disease: scoping review and evidence mapping.Langenbeck's archives of surgery · 2026Article
- Artificial intelligence and digital transformation of gastroenterology and hepatology: A critical review of clinical applications and future challenges.World journal of hepatology · 2026Review
- Artificial Intelligence and FLIP Panometry-Automated Classification of Esophageal Motility Patterns.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- Future perspectives in esophageal manometry.World journal of gastrointestinal surgery · 2025Review
- Improved Performance of an Updated Artificial Intelligence Model for Interpretation of Functional Lumen Imaging Probe Panometry Studies.Neurogastroenterology and motility · 2025Article
- Emerging innovation, artificial intelligence, and digital technology in esophagology.Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences · 2025Review
- A Standardized Approach to Performing and Interpreting Functional Lumen Imaging Probe Panometry for Esophageal Motility Disorders: The Dallas Consensus.Gastroenterology · 2025Article
- Gemini-Assisted Deep Learning Classification Model for Automated Diagnosis of High-Resolution Esophageal Manometry Images.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2024Article
- Artificial Intelligence Tools for Improving Manometric Diagnosis of Esophageal Dysmotility.Current gastroenterology reports · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundFunctional lumen imaging probe (FLIP) Panometry is performed at the time of sedated endoscopy and evaluates esophageal motility in response to distension. This study aimed to develop and test an automated artificial intelligence (AI) platform that could interpret FLIP Panometry studies.
methodsThe study cohort included 678 consecutive patients and 35 asymptomatic controls that completed FLIP Panometry during endoscopy and high-resolution manometry (HRM). "True" study labels for model training and testing were assigned by experienced esophagologists per a hierarchical classification scheme. The supervised, deep learning, AI model generated FLIP Panometry heatmaps from raw FLIP data and based on convolutional neural networks assigned esophageal motility labels using a two-stage prediction model. Model performance was tested on a 15% held-out test set (n = 103); the remainder of the studies were utilized for model training (n = 610). KEY
results"True" FLIP labels across the entire cohort included 190 (27%) "normal," 265 (37%) "not normal/not achalasia," and 258 (36%) "achalasia." On the test set, both the Normal/Not normal and the achalasia/not achalasia models achieved an accuracy of 89% (with 89%/88% recall, 90%/89% precision, respectively). Of 28 patients with achalasia (per HRM) in the test set, 0 were predicted as "normal" and 93% as "achalasia" by the AI model.
conclusionsAn AI platform provided accurate interpretation of FLIP Panometry esophageal motility studies from a single center compared with the impression of experienced FLIP Panometry interpreters. This platform may provide useful clinical decision support for esophageal motility diagnosis from FLIP Panometry studies performed at the time of endoscopy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.