Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36808777›Full record

ArticleNeurogastroenterology and motility2023

An artificial intelligence platform provides an accurate interpretation of esophageal motility from Functional Lumen Imaging Probe Panometry studies.

Wenjun Kou, Priyanka Soni, Matthew W Klug, Mozziyar Etemadi, Peter J Kahrilas, John E Pandolfino, Dustin A Carlson

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Neurogastroenterology and motility, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Future perspectives in esophageal manometry.World journal of gastrointestinal surgery · 2025
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Wenjun KouDivision of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Medicine, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-2582-2070
Priyanka SoniDepartment of Anesthesiology, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois, USA.
Matthew W KlugDepartment of Information Services, Northwestern Medicine, Chicago, Illinois, USA.
Mozziyar EtemadiDepartment of Anesthesiology, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois, USA.
Peter J KahrilasDivision of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Medicine, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-8260-1250
John E PandolfinoDivision of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Medicine, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois, USA.
Dustin A CarlsonDivision of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Medicine, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-1702-7758

Funding

Role of altered response to volumetric distension in esophageal diseaseP01DK117824 · NIDDK · NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY AT CHICAGO · PI PANDOLFINO, JOHN E · 2018 to 2022
$7.3M
NIDDK NIH HHS P01 DK117824
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundFunctional lumen imaging probe (FLIP) Panometry is performed at the time of sedated endoscopy and evaluates esophageal motility in response to distension. This study aimed to develop and test an automated artificial intelligence (AI) platform that could interpret FLIP Panometry studies.

methodsThe study cohort included 678 consecutive patients and 35 asymptomatic controls that completed FLIP Panometry during endoscopy and high-resolution manometry (HRM). "True" study labels for model training and testing were assigned by experienced esophagologists per a hierarchical classification scheme. The supervised, deep learning, AI model generated FLIP Panometry heatmaps from raw FLIP data and based on convolutional neural networks assigned esophageal motility labels using a two-stage prediction model. Model performance was tested on a 15% held-out test set (n = 103); the remainder of the studies were utilized for model training (n = 610). KEY

results"True" FLIP labels across the entire cohort included 190 (27%) "normal," 265 (37%) "not normal/not achalasia," and 258 (36%) "achalasia." On the test set, both the Normal/Not normal and the achalasia/not achalasia models achieved an accuracy of 89% (with 89%/88% recall, 90%/89% precision, respectively). Of 28 patients with achalasia (per HRM) in the test set, 0 were predicted as "normal" and 93% as "achalasia" by the AI model.

conclusionsAn AI platform provided accurate interpretation of FLIP Panometry esophageal motility studies from a single center compared with the impression of experienced FLIP Panometry interpreters. This platform may provide useful clinical decision support for esophageal motility diagnosis from FLIP Panometry studies performed at the time of endoscopy.

Indexed as

Esophageal AchalasiaEsophageal Motility DisordersArtificial IntelligenceEndoscopy, GastrointestinalEsophagogastric JunctionGastrointestinal TransitHumansManometrydysphagiaimpedancemachine learningspasm

Identifiers

PMID36808777
PMCPMC10272090

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.