ArticleJournal of cellular and molecular medicine2023
Proteomic profiling of epicardial fat in heart failure with preserved versus reduced and mildly reduced ejection fraction.
Article in Journal of cellular and molecular medicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 14 citations in OpenAlex.
- Immunology of heart failure with preserved ejection fraction.Expert review of clinical immunology · 2025Pooled it
- Aging epicardial adipose tissue: a metabolic-endocrine network driving vascular calcification.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2026Review
- The fat-heart entanglement and the role of 'osteopontin mechanics' in cardiometabolic senescence.European journal of clinical investigation · 2026Review
- The effects of SGLT2i on cardiac metabolism in patients with HFpEF: Fact or fiction?Cardiovascular diabetology · 2025Review
- Metabolic rewiring and inter-organ crosstalk in diabetic HFpEF.Cardiovascular diabetology · 2025Review
- Epicardial Fat in Heart Failure and Preserved Ejection Fraction: Novel Insights and Future Perspectives.Current heart failure reports · 2025Review
- Pathophysiological insights into HFpEF from studies of human cardiac tissue.Nature reviews. Cardiology · 2025Review
- Analysis of the correlation between EAT thickness and prognosis in patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2025Article
- Microvascular rarefaction caused by the NOTCH signaling pathway is a key cause of TKI-apatinib-induced hypertension and cardiac damage.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2024Review
- Proteomic profiling of epicardial fat in heart failure with preserved versus reduced and mildly reduced ejection fraction.Journal of cellular and molecular medicine · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In order to explore the proteomic signatures of epicardial adipose tissue (EAT) related to the mechanism of heart failure with reduced and mildly reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF/HFmrEF) and heart failure (HF) with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF), a comprehensive proteomic analysis of EAT was made in HFrEF/HFmrEF (n = 5) and HFpEF (n = 5) patients with liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry experiments. The selected differential proteins were verified between HFrEF/HFmrEF (n = 20) and HFpEF (n = 40) by ELISA (enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay). A total of 599 EAT proteins were significantly different in expression between HFrEF/HFmrEF and HFpEF. Among the 599 proteins, 58 proteins increased in HFrEF/HFmrEF compared to HFpEF, whereas 541 proteins decreased in HFrEF/HFmrEF. Of these proteins, TGM2 in EAT was down-regulated in HFrEF/HFmrEF patients and was confirmed to decrease in circulating plasma of the HFrEF/HFmrEF group (p = 0.019). Multivariate logistic regression analysis confirmed plasma TGM2 could be an independent predictor of HFrEF/HFmrEF (p = 0.033). Receiver operating curve analysis indicated that the combination of TGM2 and Gensini score improved the diagnostic value of HFrEF/HFmrEF (p = 0.002). In summary, for the first time, we described the proteome in EAT in both HFpEF and HFrEF/HFmrEF and identified a comprehensive dimension of potential targets for the mechanism behind the EF spectrum. Exploring the role of EAT may offer potential targets for preventive intervention of HF.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.