ArticleAnnals of surgical oncology2023
Disease-Free Interval and Tumor Stage Complementarily Predict the Biological Behavior of Recurrent Hepatocellular Carcinoma.
Article in Annals of surgical oncology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- OLFML2B promotes hepatocellular carcinoma malignancy via the PI3K/AKT-EMT axis and correlates with an immunosuppressive tumor microenvironment.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Article
- Prognostic Impact of the Pathologic Response of Patients with Hepatocellular Carcinoma After Preoperative Treatments.Annals of surgical oncology · 2025Article
- Time to recurrence and BCLC stage at recurrence as critical variables in guiding treatment decisions for early-recurrent hepatocellular carcinoma after liver resection.Frontiers in oncology · 2025Article
- Article
- Clinical Utility of the Novel Oncological Criteria of Resectability for Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma.Liver cancer · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundCurrently used treatment algorithms were originally established based on the clinical outcomes of the initial treatment for primary hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), and no strong evidence exists yet to suggest if these algorithms could also be applicable to patients with recurrent HCC after surgery. As such, this study sought to explore an optimal risk stratification method for cases of recurrent HCC for better clinical management.
methodsAmong the 1616 patients who underwent curative resection for HCC, the clinical features and survival outcomes of 983 patients who developed recurrence were examined in detail.
resultsMultivariate analysis confirmed that both the disease-free interval (DFI) from the previous surgery and tumor stage at recurrence were significant prognostic factors. However, the prognostic impact of DFI seemed different according to the tumor stages at recurrence. While curative-intent treatment showed strong influence on survival [hazard ratio (HR), 0.61; P < 0.001] regardless of the DFI in patients with stage 0 or stage A disease at recurrence, early recurrence (< 6 months) was a poor prognostic marker in patients with stage B disease. The prognosis of patients with stage C disease was exclusively influenced by the tumor distribution or choice of treatment than by the DFI.
conclusionsThe DFI complementarily predicts the oncological behavior of recurrent HCC, with its predictive value differing depending on the tumor stage at recurrence. These factors should be considered for selection of the optimal treatment in patients with recurrent HCC after curative-intent surgery.
Indexed as
Identifiers
36808590What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.