Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36808563›Full record

ArticleJournal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education2023

Preferences for Breast and Cervical Cancer Screening Among Women and Men in Kenya: Key Considerations for Designing Implementation Strategies to Increase Screening Uptake.

Robai Gakunga, Zipporah Ali, Asaph Kinyanjui, Madeleine Jones, Esther Muinga, David Musyoki, Miriam Igobwa, Mackuline Atieno, Sujha Subramanian

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Robai Gakunga, Nairobi, Kenya. robaigakunga@yahoo.com.ORCID 0000-0002-8430-0144
Zipporah AliZipporah Ali Consultancy, Nairobi, Kenya.
Asaph KinyanjuiNairobi Hospice, Nairobi, Kenya.
Madeleine JonesRTI International, Durham, NC, USA.
Esther MuingaKenya Hospices and Palliative Care Association, Nairobi, Kenya.
David MusyokiKenya Hospices and Palliative Care Association, Nairobi, Kenya.
Miriam IgobwaKenya Hospices and Palliative Care Association, Nairobi, Kenya.
Mackuline AtienoKenya Hospices and Palliative Care Association, Nairobi, Kenya.
Sujha SubramanianRTI International, Durham, NC, USA.
RTI International · USNairobi Hospital · KEYahoo (United Kingdom) · GB

Funding

Evidence-based Approaches, Financing and Tools for Cost-Effective Scale-up Cervical Cancer Prevention in Sub-Saharan AfricaR01CA200845 · NCI · RESEARCH TRIANGLE INSTITUTE · PI SUBRAMANIAN, SUJHA · 2016 to 2018
$1.4M
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA200845
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Breast and cervical cancer incidence rates and mortality rates in Kenya are high. Screening is globally accepted as a strategy for early detection and downstaging of these cancers for better outcomes, but despite the efforts established by the Kenyan government to provide these services to eligible populations, uptake has remained disproportionately low. Using data from a larger study aimed at understanding the implementation and scale-up of cervical cancer screening services, we analyzed data to compare the preferences for breast and cervical cancer screening services between men and women (25-49 years) in rural and urban communities in Kenya. Participants were recruited in concentric circles starting at the center of six subcounties. One woman and one man per household were enrolled for data collection on a continuous basis. More than 90% of both men and women had a monthly income of less than US $500. The top three preferred sources of information on screening for cancers affecting women were health care providers; community health volunteers; and media such as television, radio, newspapers, and magazines. More women (43.6%) than men (28.0%) trusted community health volunteers to provide health information on cancer screening. Printed materials and mobile phone messages were preferred by approximately 30% of both genders. Over 75% of both men and women preferred an integrated model of service delivery. These findings show that there are many similarities that can be leveraged when designing implementation strategies for population-wide breast and cervical cancer screening hence reducing the challenge of addressing diverse preferences of men and women which may not be easy to reconcile.

Indexed as

Uterine Cervical NeoplasmsEarly Detection of CancerFemaleHumansIncomeKenyaMaleMass ScreeningRural PopulationBreast cancerCancer educationCancer screeningCervical cancer

Identifiers

PMID36808563
OpenAlexW4321478491

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.