Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36808540›Full record

ArticleLung2023

Canadian Health Care Professionals' Familiarity with Chronic Cough Guidelines and Experiences with Diagnosis and Management: A Cross-Sectional Survey.

Elena Kum, Danica Brister, Nermin Diab, Mustafaa Wahab, Ted Abraham, Sevag Sahakian, Kaiser Qureshy, Paul Hernandez, Harold Kim, Maxime Cormier and 6 more

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Lung, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
2.8field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors at 10 institutions in 1 country.

Elena KumDepartment of Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-6548-2632
Danica BristerDepartment of Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada.
Nermin DiabDivision of Respirology, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada.
Mustafaa WahabDepartment of Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada.
Ted AbrahamMerck Canada, Inc., Toronto, ON, Canada.
Sevag SahakianMerck Canada, Inc., Toronto, ON, Canada.
Kaiser QureshySouthmount Health Care Centre, Stoney Creek, ON, Canada.
Paul HernandezDivision of Respirology, Department of Medicine, Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS, Canada.ORCID 0000-0003-2052-0102
Harold KimDepartment of Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada.
Maxime CormierRoyal Victoria Hospital, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada.
Peter LinCanadian Heart Research Centre, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Anne EllisDivision of Allergy & Immunology, Department of Medicine, Queen's University, Kingston, ON, Canada.
Louis-Philippe BouletQuebec Heart and Lung Institute, Université Laval, Quebec, QC, Canada.ORCID 0000-0003-3485-9393
Alan KaplanDepartment of Family and Community Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.ORCID 0000-0001-8795-5528
Stephen K FieldDepartment of Medicine, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-6682-4155
Imran SatiaDepartment of Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada. satiai@mcmaster.ca.ORCID 0000-0003-4206-6000
McMaster University · CACanadian Heart Research Centre · CADalhousie University · CAMcMaster University Medical Centre · CAQueen's University · CARoyal Victoria Hospital · CAUniversité Laval · CAUniversity of Calgary · CAUniversity of Toronto · CAWestern University · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionEducational programs on chronic cough may improve patient care, but little is known about how Canadian physicians manage this common debilitating condition. We aimed to investigate Canadian physicians' perceptions, attitudes, and knowledge of chronic cough.

methodsWe administered a 10-min anonymous, online, cross-sectional survey to 3321 Canadian physicians in the Leger Opinion Panel who managed adult patients with chronic cough and had been in practice for > 2 years.

resultsBetween July 30 and September 22, 2021, 179 physicians (101 general practitioners [GPs] and 78 specialists [25 allergists, 28 respirologists, and 25 ear/nose/throat specialists]) completed the survey (response rate: 5.4%). In a month, GPs saw a mean of 27 patients with chronic cough, whereas specialists saw 46. About one-third of physicians appropriately identified a duration of > 8 weeks as the definition for chronic cough. Many physicians reported not using international chronic cough management guidelines. Patient referrals and care pathways varied considerably, and patients frequently experienced lost to follow-up. While physicians endorsed nasal and inhaled corticosteroids as common treatments for chronic cough, they rarely used other guideline-recommended treatments. Both GPs and specialists expressed high interest in education on chronic cough.

conclusionThis survey of Canadian physicians demonstrates low uptake of recent advances in chronic cough diagnosis, disease categorization, and pharmacologic management. Canadian physicians also report unfamiliarity with guideline-recommended therapies, including centrally acting neuromodulators for refractory or unexplained chronic cough. This data highlights the need for educational programs and collaborative care models on chronic cough in primary and specialist care.

Indexed as

CoughPhysiciansAdultCanadaChronic DiseaseCross-Sectional StudiesHumansPractice Patterns, Physicians'Surveys and QuestionnairesCanadaChronic coughDiagnosisPhysician surveyTreatment

Identifiers

PMID36808540
OpenAlexW4321352569

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.