Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36808287›Full record

Observational studyArchives of gynecology and obstetrics2023

Comparison of 2-year follow-up outcomes of laparoscopic lateral suspension and sacrospinous fixation in apical compartment prolapse: an observational study.

Kübra Baki Erin, Ayşe Şeyma Taştan, Yunus Katırcı, Ayşe Zehra Özdemir, Davut Güven, Kadir Önem, Mesut Önal, Recep Erin, Deniz Kulaksiz

Abstract readObservational Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Observational study in Archives of gynecology and obstetrics, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Observational
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Kübra Baki ErinDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Trabzon Kanuni Health Practice and Research Center, University of Health Sciences, Trabzon, Turkey. kubrabakierin@gmail.com.ORCID 0000-0002-6626-1735
Ayşe Şeyma TaştanDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Medical School, Ondokuz Mayıs University, Samsun, Turkey.
Yunus KatırcıDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Medical School, Ondokuz Mayıs University, Samsun, Turkey.
Ayşe Zehra ÖzdemirDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Medical School, Ondokuz Mayıs University, Samsun, Turkey.
Davut GüvenDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Medical School, Ondokuz Mayıs University, Samsun, Turkey.
Kadir ÖnemDepartment of Urology, Medicine Faculty, Ondokuz Mayıs University, Samsun, Turkey.
Mesut ÖnalDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Medical School, Ondokuz Mayıs University, Samsun, Turkey.
Recep ErinDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Trabzon Kanuni Health Practice and Research Center, University of Health Sciences, Trabzon, Turkey.
Deniz KulaksizDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Trabzon Kanuni Health Practice and Research Center, University of Health Sciences, Trabzon, Turkey.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThis study aimed to compare the results of patients with laparoscopic lateral suspension (LLS) and sacrospinous fixation (SSF).

methodsThis prospective observational study included 52 patients who underwent LLS and 53 patients who underwent SSF due to pelvic organ prolapse. The pelvic organ prolapse's anatomical cure and the frequency of recurrence have been recorded. Female Sexual Function Index, Pelvic Organ Prolapse Symptom Score, and complications were evaluated preoperatively and at the postoperative 24th month.

resultsIn the LLS group, the subjective treatment rate was 88.4% and the anatomical cure rate for apical prolapse was 96.1%. In the SSF group, the subjective treatment rate was 83.0% and the anatomical cure rate for apical prolapse was 90.5%. There was a significant difference between the groups regarding Clavien-Dindo classification and reoperation (p < 0.05). Female Sexual Function Index, and the Pelvic Organ Prolapse Symptom Score were different between the groups (p < 0.05).

conclusionsThis study showed that there is no difference between two surgical techniques in apical prolapse cure rates. However, the LLS seem preferable in terms of the Female Sexual Function Index, Pelvic Organ Prolapse Symptom Score, reoperation, and complications. We need larger sample size studies in terms of incidence of complications and reoperation.

Indexed as

LaparoscopyPelvic Organ ProlapseFemaleFollow-Up StudiesGynecologic Surgical ProceduresHumansLigamentsProspective StudiesSurgical MeshTreatment OutcomeApical prolapseFemale Sexual Function IndexLaparoscopic lateral suspensionPelvic Organ Prolapse Symptom ScoreSacrospinous fixation

Identifiers

PMID36808287

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.