Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36808262›Full record

ArticleGastric cancer : official journal of the International Gastric Cancer Association and the Japanese Gastric Cancer Association2023

Improved survival after laparoscopic compared to open gastrectomy for advanced gastric cancer: a Swedish population-based cohort study.

Andrianos Tsekrekos, Laura E Vossen, Lars Lundell, Martin Jeremiasen, Erik Johnsson, Jakob Hedberg, David Edholm, Fredrik Klevebro, Magnus Nilsson, Ioannis Rouvelas

Registry-linked trialOpen access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Gastric cancer : official journal of the International Gastric Cancer Association and the Japanese Gastric Cancer Association, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07295002 (COmpletion Sentinel Node Resection With or Without Minimally invAsive and Endoscopic Cooperative Surgery Following noncuRative Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection for Early Gastric Cancer), which is not on this map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.9field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT07295002 nanot yet recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2026, after this paper: background citation

COmpletion Sentinel Node Resection With or Without Minimally invAsive and Endoscopic Cooperative Surgery Following noncuRative Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection for Early Gastric Cancer

TypeinterventionalSponsorRegion StockholmRan2026 to 2029Enrolled10ConditionsEarly Gastric CancerArmsICG-guided lymphadenectomy, Laparoscopic and endoscopic cooperative surgery (LECS)
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 6 institutions in 2 countries.

Andrianos TsekrekosDepartment of Upper Abdominal Surgery, Karolinska University Hospital, C1:77, Stockholm, Sweden. andrianos.tsekrekos@ki.se.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2128-7157
Laura E VossenDepartment of Upper Abdominal Surgery, Karolinska University Hospital, C1:77, Stockholm, Sweden.
Lars LundellDivision of Surgery, Department of Clinical Science, Intervention and Technology (CLINTEC), Karolinska Institutet, Hälsovägen 13, 141 57, Huddinge, Stockholm, Sweden.
Martin JeremiasenDepartment of Surgery, Skåne University Hospital and Department of Clinical Sciences, Lund University, Lund, Sweden.
Erik JohnssonDepartment of Surgery, Sahlgrenska University Hospital and Institute of Clinical Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy at the University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden.
Jakob HedbergDepartment of Surgical Sciences, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.
David EdholmDepartment of Surgery, Biomedical and Clinical Sciences, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden.
Fredrik KlevebroDepartment of Upper Abdominal Surgery, Karolinska University Hospital, C1:77, Stockholm, Sweden.
Magnus NilssonDepartment of Upper Abdominal Surgery, Karolinska University Hospital, C1:77, Stockholm, Sweden.
Ioannis RouvelasDepartment of Upper Abdominal Surgery, Karolinska University Hospital, C1:77, Stockholm, Sweden.
Karolinska University Hospital · SELinköping University · SELund University · SEOdense University Hospital · DKSahlgrenska University Hospital · SEUppsala University · SE

Funding

Cancerfonden 211382Fk01HCenter for Innovative Medicine FoUI-961729
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundLaparoscopic gastrectomy is increasingly used for the treatment of locally advanced gastric cancer but concerns remain whether similar results can be obtained compared to open gastrectomy, especially in Western populations. This study compared the short-term postoperative, oncological and survival outcomes following laparoscopic versus open gastrectomy based on data from the Swedish National Register for Esophageal and Gastric Cancer.

methodsPatients who underwent surgery with curative intent for adenocarcinoma of the stomach or gastroesophageal junction Siewert type III from 2015 to 2020 were identified, and 622 patients with cT2-4aN0-3M0 tumors were included. The impact of surgical approach on short-term outcomes was assessed using multivariable logistic regression. Long-term survival was compared using multivariable Cox regression.

resultsIn total, 350 patients underwent open and 272 laparoscopic gastrectomy, of which 12.9% were converted to open surgery. The groups were similar regarding distribution of clinical disease stage (27.6% stage I, 46.0% stage II, and 26.4% stage III). Neoadjuvant chemotherapy was administered to 52.7% of the patients. There was no difference in the rate of postoperative complications, but laparoscopic approach was associated with lower 90 day mortality (1.8 vs 4.9%, p = 0.043). The median number of resected lymph nodes was higher after laparoscopic surgery (32 vs 26, p < 0.001), while no difference was found in the rate of tumor-free resection margins. Better overall survival was observed after laparoscopic gastrectomy (HR 0.63, p < 0.001).

conclusionsLaparoscopic gastrectomy can be safely preformed for advanced gastric cancer and is associated with improved overall survival compared to open surgery.

Indexed as

Esophageal NeoplasmsLaparoscopyStomach NeoplasmsCohort StudiesGastrectomyHumansRetrospective StudiesSwedenTreatment OutcomeAdvanced gastric cancerLaparoscopic gastrectomyMinimally invasive surgerySurvival

Identifiers

PMID36808262
PMCPMC10115725
OpenAlexW4321478584

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.