Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36808196›Full record

ArticleRomanian journal of morphology and embryology = Revue roumaine de morphologie et embryologie

Meropenem antibiotic therapy in acute secondary peritonitis, therapeutic effects superior to other therapies - experimental clinical and histopathological study in the laboratory animal.

Costin George Florea, Daniel Alin Cristian, Ionuţ Simion Coman, Cristin Coman, Teodoru Soare, Anwar Erchid, Iancu Emil Pleşea, Mircea Liţescu, Valentin Titus Grigorean

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Romanian journal of morphology and embryology = Revue roumaine de morphologie et embryologie. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact, top 96% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Costin George FloreaDepartments of Surgery, Faculty of Dentistry, Carol Davila University of Medicine and Pharmacy, and Sf. Ioan Emergency Clinical Hospital, Bucharest, Romania; mircealitescu@gmail.com; Doctoral School, Carol Davila University of Medicine and Pharmacy, and Department of Pathology, Bagdasar-Arseni Emergency Clinical Hospital, Bucharest, Romania; pie1956@yahoo.com.
Daniel Alin Cristian
Ionuţ Simion Coman
Cristin Coman
Teodoru Soare
Anwar Erchid
Iancu Emil Pleşea
Mircea Liţescu
Valentin Titus Grigorean
Carol Davila University of Medicine and Pharmacy · ROClinical Emergency Hospital Bucharest · ROUniversity of Agronomic Sciences and Veterinary Medicine of Bucharest · RO

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimA perforated peptic ulcer is the most common cause of peritonitis through the perforation of the digestive tube, which occurs in a percentage between 2% and 14% of patients diagnosed with peptic ulcer and being associated with a 10% to 30% mortality rate. MATERIALS AND

methodsConsidering the above, we imagined a study, using laboratory animals, in which we produced gastric perforations, then followed their evolution without antibiotic treatment and under antibiotic therapy with Cefuroxime 25 mg∕kg∕24 hours intravenously or Meropenem 40 mg∕kg∕24 hours intravenously, following the tissue changes both macroscopically and microscopically.

resultsThe study revealed a mortality of 36.6%, most deaths (81.82%) occurred in the first 24 hours after the perforation, all subjects belonging to the group that did not receive antibiotic treatment and the group treated with Cefuroxime. From a clinical point of view (evaluation of the general condition), macroscopically and microscopically, a better evolution of the subjects who received antibiotic therapy can be observed, compared to those who did not receive antibiotic therapy, thus in the case of subjects who received antibiotic therapy, the absence or the presence of a small amount of intraperitoneal fluid, which has a serocitrine appearance, as well as the absence of macroscopic changes at the level of unaffected intraperitoneal organs, can be observed. Microscopically, it can be seen that in the subjects treated with Meropenem, changes in the parietal peritoneum were minimal.

conclusionsAntibiotic therapy with Meropenem in acute peritonitis has a survival rate comparable to peritoneal lavage and source control.

Indexed as

Peptic Ulcer PerforationPeritonitisAnimalsAnimals, LaboratoryAnti-Bacterial AgentsCefuroximeMeropenemAnti-Bacterial AgentsCefuroximeMeropenem

Identifiers

PMID36808196
PMCPMC10026927
OpenAlexW4321478732

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.