Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36807845›Full record

ReviewWiley interdisciplinary reviews. Nanomedicine and nanobiotechnology

Gene-encoded nanoparticle vaccine platforms for in vivo assembly of multimeric antigen to promote adaptive immunity.

Nicholas J Tursi, Ziyang Xu, Daniel W Kulp, David B Weiner

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Wiley interdisciplinary reviews. Nanomedicine and nanobiotechnology. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Nanoparticle Immunoadjuvant Complexes Augment Germinal Center Responses to Vaccination.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2026
    Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Advances in virus-like particle-based SARS-CoV-2 vaccines.Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2024
    Review
  9. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Nicholas J TursiVaccine and Immunotherapy Center, The Wistar Institute, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-6752-3402
Ziyang XuVaccine and Immunotherapy Center, The Wistar Institute, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-7690-7029
Daniel W KulpVaccine and Immunotherapy Center, The Wistar Institute, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.
David B WeinerVaccine and Immunotherapy Center, The Wistar Institute, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.
The Wistar Institute · US

Funding

COLLABORATIVE INFLUENZA VACCINE INNOVATION CENTER: UNIVERSAL INFLUENZA VACCINE RESEARCH75N93019C00051 · NIAID · ICAHN SCHOOL OF MEDICINE AT MOUNT SINAI · PI KRAMMER, FLORIAN · 2019 to 2025
$105.4M
Synthetic DNA & Novel Env Vaccine for HIVU19AI109646 · NIAID · WISTAR INSTITUTE · PI SARDESAI, NIRANJAN Y · 2015 to 2019
$16.7M
Structural vaccinology guided development of a universal CoV vaccine utilizing nucleic acid delivered nanoparticlesP01AI165066 · NIAID · WISTAR INSTITUTE · PI DAVID B. WEINER · 2022 to 2026
$5.3M
NIAID NIH HHS 75N93019C00051NIAID NIH HHS P01 AI165066NIAID NIH HHS U19 AI109646
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Nanoparticle vaccines are a diverse category of vaccines for the prophylaxis or treatment of various diseases. Several strategies have been employed for their optimization, especially to enhance vaccine immunogenicity and generate potent B-cell responses. Two major modalities utilized for particulate antigen vaccines include using nanoscale structures for antigen delivery and nanoparticles that are themselves vaccines due to antigen display or scaffolding-the latter of which we will define as "nanovaccines." Multimeric antigen display has a variety of immunological benefits compared to monomeric vaccines mediated through potentiating antigen-presenting cell presentation and enhancing antigen-specific B-cell responses through B-cell activation. The majority of nanovaccine assembly is done in vitro using cell lines. However, in vivo assembly of scaffolded vaccines potentiated using nucleic acids or viral vectors is a burgeoning modality of nanovaccine delivery. Several advantages to in vivo assembly exist, including lower costs of production, fewer production barriers, as well as more rapid development of novel vaccine candidates for emerging diseases such as SARS-CoV-2. This review will characterize the methods for de novo assembly of nanovaccines in the host using methods of gene delivery including nucleic acid and viral vectored vaccines. This article is categorized under: Therapeutic Approaches and Drug Discovery > Nanomedicine for Infectious Disease Biology-Inspired Nanomaterials > Nucleic Acid-Based Structures Biology-Inspired Nanomaterials > Protein and Virus-Based Structures Therapeutic Approaches and Drug Discovery > Emerging Technologies.

Indexed as

COVID-19NanoparticlesVaccinesAdaptive ImmunityAntigensHumansSARS-CoV-2AntigensVaccinesantigen scaffoldingde novo assemblynanoparticle vaccinesnucleic acid vaccinesviral vectored vaccines

Identifiers

PMID36807845
PMCPMC10665986
OpenAlexW4321458769

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.