Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36807734›Full record

Trial reportJournal of interventional cardiac electrophysiology : an international journal of arrhythmias and pacing2023

Multicenter prospective comparison of conventional and high-power short duration radiofrequency application for pulmonary vein isolation: the high-power short-duration radiofrequency application for faster and safer pulmonary vein ablation (POWER FAST III) trial.

Sergio Castrejón-Castrejón, Marcel Martínez Cossiani, Miguel Jáuregui-Abularach, Nuria Basterra Sola, José Luis Ibáñez Criado, Joaquín Osca Asensi, Ivo Roca Luque, Angel Moya Mitjans, Aurelio Quesada Dorador, Víctor Manuel Hidalgo Olivares and 12 more

Abstract readMulticenter StudyComparative StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in Journal of interventional cardiac electrophysiology : an international journal of arrhythmias and pacing, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
3.1field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Very high-power short-duration radiofrequency ablation in patients with typical atrial flutter: rationale and design of the FASD-HP randomized trial.Journal of interventional cardiac electrophysiology : an international journal of arrhythmias and pacing · 2025
    Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Very high-power and short-duration radiofrequency ablation for atrial fibrillation in a Latin American low-volume private center.Journal of interventional cardiac electrophysiology : an international journal of arrhythmias and pacing · 2024
    Observational
  6. High efficiency single-catheter workflow for radiofrequency atrial fibrillation ablation in the QDOT catheter era.Journal of interventional cardiac electrophysiology : an international journal of arrhythmias and pacing · 2024
    Article
  7. 2024 European Heart Rhythm Association/Heart Rhythm Society/Asia Pacific Heart Rhythm Society/Latin American Heart Rhythm Society expert consensus statement on catheter and surgical ablation of atrial fibrillation.Europace : European pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac electrophysiology : journal of the working groups on cardiac pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac cellular electrophysiology of the European Society of Cardiology · 2024
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

22 authors at 11 institutions in 1 country.

Sergio Castrejón-CastrejónArrhythmia & Robotic EP Unit, Cardiology Department, Hospital Universitario La Paz-IdiPaz, Madrid, Spain.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8032-2004
Marcel Martínez CossianiArrhythmia & Robotic EP Unit, Cardiology Department, Hospital Universitario La Paz-IdiPaz, Madrid, Spain.
Miguel Jáuregui-AbularachArrhythmia & Robotic EP Unit, Cardiology Department, Hospital Universitario La Paz-IdiPaz, Madrid, Spain.
Nuria Basterra SolaCardiology Department, Complejo Hospitalario de Navarra-IdiSNA (Navarra Institute for Health Research), Pamplona, Spain.
José Luis Ibáñez CriadoCardiology Department, Hospital General Universitario de Alicante-ISABIAL (Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria Y Biomédica de Alicante), Alicante, Spain.
Joaquín Osca AsensiCardiology Department, Hospital La Fe, Valencia, Spain.
Ivo Roca LuqueCardiology Department, Hospital Clínic, Barcelona, Spain.
Angel Moya MitjansArrhythmia Unit, Hospital Universitari Dexeus, Barcelona, Spain.
Aurelio Quesada DoradorCardiology Department, Hospital General Universitario de Valencia, Valencia, Spain.
Víctor Manuel Hidalgo OlivaresCardiology Department, Complejo Hospitalario Universitario de Albacete, Albacete, Spain.
Nicasio Pérez CastellanoCardiology Department, Hospital Clínico, Madrid, Spain.
Juan Manuel Fernández GómezCardiology Department, Hospital Universitario Juan Ramón Jiménez, Huelva, Spain.
María Rosa Macías-RuizCardiology Department, Hospital Universitario Virgen de Las Nieves, Granada, Spain.
Bruno Bochard VillanuevaCardiology Department, Hospital Público Universitario de La Ribera, Alzira, Spain.
Nerea Gonzalo BadaAcute Care Unit, Department of Gastroenterology, Hospital Universitario La Paz-IdiPaz, Madrid, Spain.
Andrés Fernández PrietoNeuroradiology Unit, Hospital Universitario La Paz-IdiPaz, Madrid, Spain.
Leonardo Elías Guido LópezArrhythmia & Robotic EP Unit, Cardiology Department, Hospital Universitario La Paz-IdiPaz, Madrid, Spain.
María Eugenia Martínez MaldonadoArrhythmia & Robotic EP Unit, Cardiology Department, Hospital Universitario La Paz-IdiPaz, Madrid, Spain.
Daniel MerinoArrhythmia & Robotic EP Unit, Cardiology Department, Hospital Universitario La Paz-IdiPaz, Madrid, Spain.
Carlos Escobar CervantesArrhythmia & Robotic EP Unit, Cardiology Department, Hospital Universitario La Paz-IdiPaz, Madrid, Spain.
José Luis MerinoArrhythmia & Robotic EP Unit, Cardiology Department, Hospital Universitario La Paz-IdiPaz, Madrid, Spain. lapaz@arritmias.net.
POWER FAST III trial investigators
Hospital Universitario La Paz · ESComplejo Hospitalario de Navarra · ESComplejo Hospitalario Universitario de Albacete · ESHospital Clínic de Barcelona · ESHospital de La Ribera · ESHospital General Universitario de Alicante Doctor Balmis · ESHospital General Universitario De Valencia · ESHospital Juan Ramón Jiménez · ESHospital Universitario Dexeus · ESHospital Universitario Virgen de las Nieves · ESLeitat Technological Center · ES

Funding

Instituto de Salud Carlos III Development StrategyInstituto de Salud Carlos III PI18/01522Instituto de Salud Carlos III Spanish Health ResearchSociedad Española de Cardiología EC-BAYER projects for clinical investigation in Cardiology 2018
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundElectrical isolation of pulmonary veins (PV) with high-power short-duration (HPSD) radiofrequency application (RFa) may reduce the duration of atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation, without compromising the procedural efficacy and safety in comparison with the conventional approach. This hypothesis has been generated in several observational studies; the POWER FAST III will test it in a randomized multicenter clinical trial.

methodsIt is a multicenter randomized, open-label and non-inferiority clinical trial with two parallel groups. AF ablation using 70 W and 9-10 s RFa is compared with the conventional technique using 25-40 W RFa guided by numerical lesion indexes. The main efficacy objective is the incidence of atrial arrhythmia recurrences electrocardiographically documented during 1-year follow-up. The main safety objective is the incidence of endoscopically detected esophageal thermal lesions (EDEL). This trial includes a substudy of incidence of asymptomatic cerebral lesions detected by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) after ablation.

resultsA randomized clinical trial compares for the first time high-power short-duration and conventional ablation in order to obtain data about the efficacy and safety of the high-power technique in an adequate methodological context.

conclusionsThe results of the POWER FAST III could support the use of the high-power short-duration ablation in clinical practice. REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov: NTC04153747.

Indexed as

Atrial FibrillationCatheter AblationPulmonary VeinsAgedFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedProspective StudiesTreatment OutcomeAblationAtrial fibrillationHigh-power short durationRadiofrequency

Identifiers

PMID36807734
OpenAlexW4321352001

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.