ArticleActa orthopaedica2023
Complications and risk factors of intramedullary bone lengthening nails: a retrospective multicenter cohort study of 314 FITBONE and PRECICE nails.
Article in Acta orthopaedica, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.
- Challenges in Reconstruction and Limb Lengthening Surgery for Congenital Lower Limb Deficiencies.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Review
- Minimally Invasive Management of Peri-implant Fractures in Intramedullary Limb Lengthening: A Technical Note.Acta orthopaedica et traumatologica turcica · 2026Article
- Evaluating ChatGPT's Role in Patient Education on Distraction Osteogenesis for Limb Lengthening.Cureus · 2026Article
- Salvage of a Broken Magnetic Tibia Nail with Plate Fixation Without Nail Removal: A Case Report.Journal of orthopaedic case reports · 2026Article
- Effect of distraction length on the morphology of knee cartilage in a rat model of femoral distraction osteogenesis.Frontiers in physiology · 2026Article
- Motorized Intramedullary Bone Transport Nail for Reconstruction of a Large Diaphyseal Bone Defect after Tumor Resection in a Child-A Case Report.Children (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Article
- Outcomes and outcome measurement instruments in lower-limb lengthening surgery: a scoping review to inform core outcome set development.Acta orthopaedica · 2024Article
- What's new in pediatric lower limb reconstruction?Journal of children's orthopaedics · 2024Article
- Simultaneous correction of leg length discrepancy and angular deformity of the distal femur with retrograde Precice nails: a retrospective analysis of 45 patients.Acta orthopaedica · 2024Article
- Review
- Limb salvage reconstruction of the lower limb with complex ankle arthrodesis and magnetic internal lengthening nail.European journal of orthopaedic surgery & traumatology : orthopedie traumatologie · 2024Article
- Epidemiology and risk factors for premature physeal closure in distal femur fractures.Acta orthopaedica · 2023Article
- Osmotic pump with potential for bone lengthening distracts continuously in vitro and in vivo.PloS one · 2023Article
- Mechanism Failures in Externally Controlled Motorized Intramedullary Lengthening Nails: A Systematic Review.JB & JS open accessReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
background and purposeIntramedullary bone-lengthening nails have become increasingly popular. The 2 most used and successful nails are the FITBONE and the PRECICE nails. Uniform reporting is lacking on complications of intramedullary bone-lengthening nails. The purpose was therefore to assess and categorize the complications of lower limb bone-lengthening nails and investigate risk factors. PATIENTS AND
methodsWe performed a retrospective review of patients operated on with intramedullary lengthening nails at 2 hospitals. We included only lower limb lengthening with FITBONE and PRECICE nails. Recorded patient data was patient demographics, nail information, and any complication. Complications were graded according to severity and origin classification. Complication risk factors were assessed with modified Poisson regression.
results314 segments in 257 patients were included. The FITBONE nail was predominantly used (75%), and most of the lengthenings were performed in the femur (80%). 53% of the patients had complications. 269 complications were identified in 175 segments (144 patients). Device-related complications were most frequent (0.3 complications/segment), followed by joint complications (0.2 complications/segment). An increased relative risk was found for complications in the tibia compared with the femur and for age groups above 30 years compared with the 10-19 years group.
conclusionComplications with intramedullary bone lengthening nails were more frequent than has previously been reported, with 53% of patients sustaining a complication. Future studies need to document the complications meticulously so that the true risk can be established.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.