Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36807707›Full record

ArticleActa orthopaedica2023

Complications and risk factors of intramedullary bone lengthening nails: a retrospective multicenter cohort study of 314 FITBONE and PRECICE nails.

Markus W Frost, Ole Rahbek, Christopher Iobst, Anirejuoritse Bafor, Molly Duncan, Søren Kold

Open access · goldAbstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in Acta orthopaedica, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
3.0field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. What's new in pediatric lower limb reconstruction?Journal of children's orthopaedics · 2024
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Limb salvage reconstruction of the lower limb with complex ankle arthrodesis and magnetic internal lengthening nail.European journal of orthopaedic surgery & traumatology : orthopedie traumatologie · 2024
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Markus W FrostDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Aalborg University Hospital; Aalborg; Department of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Aalborg University, Aalborg, Denmark. markus.frost@rn.dk.
Ole RahbekDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Aalborg University Hospital; Aalborg; Department of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Aalborg University, Aalborg, Denmark.
Christopher IobstDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Center for Limb Lengthening and Reconstruction, Nationwide Children's Hospital, Columbus, OH, USA. christopher.
Anirejuoritse BaforDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Center for Limb Lengthening and Reconstruction, Nationwide Children's Hospital, Columbus, OH, USA.
Molly DuncanDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Center for Limb Lengthening and Reconstruction, Nationwide Children's Hospital, Columbus, OH, USA.
Søren KoldDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Aalborg University Hospital; Aalborg; Department of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Aalborg University, Aalborg, Denmark.
Aalborg University Hospital · DKNationwide Children's Hospital · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

background and purposeIntramedullary bone-lengthening nails have become increasingly popular. The 2 most used and successful nails are the FITBONE and the PRECICE nails. Uniform reporting is lacking on complications of intramedullary bone-lengthening nails. The purpose was therefore to assess and categorize the complications of lower limb bone-lengthening nails and investigate risk factors. PATIENTS AND

methodsWe performed a retrospective review of patients operated on with intramedullary lengthening nails at 2 hospitals. We included only lower limb lengthening with FITBONE and PRECICE nails. Recorded patient data was patient demographics, nail information, and any complication. Complications were graded according to severity and origin classification. Complication risk factors were assessed with modified Poisson regression.

results314 segments in 257 patients were included. The FITBONE nail was predominantly used (75%), and most of the lengthenings were performed in the femur (80%). 53% of the patients had complications. 269 complications were identified in 175 segments (144 patients). Device-related complications were most frequent (0.3 complications/segment), followed by joint complications (0.2 complications/segment). An increased relative risk was found for complications in the tibia compared with the femur and for age groups above 30 years compared with the 10-19 years group.

conclusionComplications with intramedullary bone lengthening nails were more frequent than has previously been reported, with 53% of patients sustaining a complication. Future studies need to document the complications meticulously so that the true risk can be established.

Indexed as

Bone LengtheningFracture Fixation, IntramedullaryAdultBone NailsCohort StudiesFemurHumansLeg Length InequalityNailsRetrospective StudiesRisk FactorsTreatment Outcome

Identifiers

PMID36807707
PMCPMC9940487
OpenAlexW4321372384

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.