ArticleBritish journal of cancer2023
Quantitative SWATH-based proteomic profiling of urine for the identification of endometrial cancer biomarkers in symptomatic women.
Article in British journal of cancer, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed.
- Advances in urinary biomarkers for endometrial cancer detection.British journal of cancer · 2026Review
- Urinary metabolomics-based machine learning for diagnosis of early gastric neoplasia: a retrospective diagnostic case-control study.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Article
- Label-free quantitative urinary proteomics for non-invasive biomarker discovery in endometrial cancer.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
- Data-Independent Acquisition (DIA)-Based Proteomics for the Identification of Biomarkers in Tissue Washings of Endometrial Cancer.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Article
- Extracellular matrix protein 1 in cancer: multifaceted roles in tumor progression, prognosis, and therapeutic targeting.Archives of pharmacal research · 2025Review
- Proteomics Approaches for Discovering Novel Protein Biomarkers in Inflammatory Bowel Disease-Related Cancer.Biomolecules · 2025Review
- Unlocking the Potential of Liquid Biopsy: A Paradigm Shift in Endometrial Cancer Care.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Unlocking the potential of tumor-derived DNA in urine for cancer detection: methodological challenges and opportunities.Molecular oncology · 2025Review
- Research Progress of DNA Methylation Markers for Endometrial Carcinoma Diagnosis.Journal of Cancer · 2025Review
- Article
- Recent progress in mass spectrometry-based urinary proteomics.Clinical proteomics · 2024Review
- Integrating proteomics and explainable artificial intelligence: a comprehensive analysis of protein biomarkers for endometrial cancer diagnosis and prognosis.Frontiers in molecular biosciences · 2024Article
- Micro-histology combined with cytology improves the diagnostic accuracy of endometrial lesions.Cancer medicine · 2023Article
- The Latest Developments in Using Proteomic Biomarkers from Urine and Serum for Non-Invasive Disease Diagnosis and Prognosis.Biomarker insights · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundA non-invasive endometrial cancer detection tool that can accurately triage symptomatic women for definitive testing would improve patient care. Urine is an attractive biofluid for cancer detection due to its simplicity and ease of collection. The aim of this study was to identify urine-based proteomic signatures that can discriminate endometrial cancer patients from symptomatic controls.
methodsThis was a prospective case-control study of symptomatic post-menopausal women (50 cancers, 54 controls). Voided self-collected urine samples were processed for mass spectrometry and run using sequential window acquisition of all theoretical mass spectra (SWATH-MS). Machine learning techniques were used to identify important discriminatory proteins, which were subsequently combined in multi-marker panels using logistic regression.
resultsThe top discriminatory proteins individually showed moderate accuracy (AUC > 0.70) for endometrial cancer detection. However, algorithms combining the most discriminatory proteins performed well with AUCs > 0.90. The best performing diagnostic model was a 10-marker panel combining SPRR1B, CRNN, CALML3, TXN, FABP5, C1RL, MMP9, ECM1, S100A7 and CFI and predicted endometrial cancer with an AUC of 0.92 (0.96-0.97). Urine-based protein signatures showed good accuracy for the detection of early-stage cancers (AUC 0.92 (0.86-0.9)).
conclusionA patient-friendly, urine-based test could offer a non-invasive endometrial cancer detection tool in symptomatic women. Validation in a larger independent cohort is warranted.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.