Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36807252›Full record

ArticleHepatology international2023

Individualized portal pressure gradient threshold based on liver function categories in preventing rebleeding after TIPS.

Yifu Xia, Jun Tie, Guangchuan Wang, Yuzheng Zhuge, Hao Wu, Hui Xue, Jiao Xu, Feng Zhang, Lianhui Zhao, Guangjun Huang and 7 more

Open access · hybridAbstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in Hepatology international, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
2.7field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. [Research advances on hepatic encephalopathy following transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt].Zhonghua gan zang bing za zhi = Zhonghua ganzangbing zazhi = Chinese journal of hepatology · 2026
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors at 11 institutions in 1 country.

Yifu Xia *Department of Gastroenterology, Shandong Provincial Hospital, Shandong University, Jinan, Shandong, China.
Jun Tie *National Clinical Research Center for Digestive Diseases and Xijing Hospital of Digestive Diseases, Air Force Medical University, Xi'an, Shaanxi, China.
Guangchuan Wang *Department of Gastroenterology, Shandong Provincial Hospital Affiliated to Shandong First Medical University, Jinan, Shandong, China.
Yuzheng ZhugeDepartment of Gastroenterology, Affiliated Drum Tower Hospital of Nanjing University Medical School, Nanjing, Jiangsu, China.
Hao WuDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, West China Hospital, Chengdu, Sichuan, China.
Hui XueGastroenterology of the First Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Jiao Tong University, Xi'an, Shaanxi, China.
Jiao XuNational Clinical Research Center for Digestive Diseases and Xijing Hospital of Digestive Diseases, Air Force Medical University, Xi'an, Shaanxi, China.
Feng ZhangDepartment of Gastroenterology, Affiliated Drum Tower Hospital of Nanjing University Medical School, Nanjing, Jiangsu, China.
Lianhui ZhaoDepartment of Gastroenterology, Shandong Provincial Hospital, Shandong University, Jinan, Shandong, China.
Guangjun HuangDepartment of Gastroenterology, Shandong Provincial Hospital Affiliated to Shandong First Medical University, Jinan, Shandong, China.
Mingyan ZhangDepartment of Gastroenterology, Shandong Provincial Hospital Affiliated to Shandong First Medical University, Jinan, Shandong, China.
Bo WeiDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, West China Hospital, Chengdu, Sichuan, China.
Peijie LiGastroenterology of the First Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Jiao Tong University, Xi'an, Shaanxi, China.
Wei WuDepartment of Gastroenterology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou, Zhejiang, China.
Chao ChenDepartment of Gastroenterology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou, Zhejiang, China.
Chengwei TangDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, West China Hospital, Chengdu, Sichuan, China. shcqcdmed@163.com.
Chunqing ZhangDepartment of Gastroenterology, Shandong Provincial Hospital, Shandong University, Jinan, Shandong, China. zhangchunqing_sdu@163.com.
Shandong Provincial Hospital · CNNanjing Drum Tower Hospital · CNShandong First Medical University · CNSichuan University · CNAir Force Medical University · CNFirst Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University · CNFirst Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Jiaotong University · CNWenzhou Medical University · CNWest China Hospital of Sichuan University · CNXi'an Jiaotong University · CNXijing Hospital · CN

Funding

National Natural Science Foundation of China 81970533National Natural Science Foundation of China 82000566
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe evidence in Portal pressure gradient (PPG) < 12 mmHg after transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) for preventing rebleeding mostly comes from observations in uncovered stents era. Moreover, association between Child-Pugh classes and post-TIPS hepatic encephalopathy (HE) has indicated that tolerance of PPG reduction depends on liver function. This study aimed to investigate the optimal PPG for covered TIPS and explore the optimal threshold tailored to the Child-Pugh classes to find individualized PPG to balance rebleeding and overt HE.

methodsThis multicenter retrospective study analyzed rebleeding, OHE, and mortality of patients associated with post-TIPS PPGs (8, 10, 12, and 14 mmHg) in the entire cohort and among different Child-Pugh classes. Propensity score matching (PSM) and competing risk analyses were performed for sensitivity analyses.

resultsWe included 2100 consecutively screened patients undergoing TIPS. In all patients, PPG < 12 mmHg reduced rebleeding after TIPS (p = 0.022). In Child-Pugh class A, none of the PPG thresholds were discriminative of clinical outcomes. In Child-Pugh class B, 12 mmHg (p = 0.022) and 14 mmHg (p = 0.037) discriminated rebleeding, but 12 mmHg showed a higher net benefit. In Child-Pugh class C, PPG < 14 mmHg had a lower rebleeding incidence (p = 0.017), and exhibited more net benefit than 12 mmHg.

conclusionDifferent PPG standards may be required for patients with different liver function categories. A PPG threshold < 12 mmHg might be suitable for patients in Child-Pugh class B, while < 14 mmHg might be optimal for patients in Child-Pugh class C.

Indexed as

Esophageal and Gastric VaricesHepatic EncephalopathyPortasystemic Shunt, Transjugular IntrahepaticGastrointestinal HemorrhageHumansLiver CirrhosisPortal PressureRetrospective StudiesTreatment OutcomeChild–Pugh classCovered stentDecompensated liver cirrhosisHepatic encephalopathyIndividualized therapyMortalityPortal hypertensionPortal pressure gradientTransjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shuntVariceal rebleeding

Identifiers

PMID36807252
PMCPMC10386972
OpenAlexW4321180192

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.