Trial reportSpine deformity2023
A United States multi-site randomized control trial of Schroth-based therapy in adolescents with mild idiopathic scoliosis.
Trial report in Spine deformity, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 13 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 16 citations in OpenAlex.
- Comparative efficacy of different scoliosis-specific exercise protocols on cobb angle in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: a network meta-analysis.Frontiers in sports and active living · 2026Pooled it
- Effects of exercise interventions on adolescents with mild to moderate scoliosis: a meta-analysis.PeerJ · 2026Pooled it
- Effectiveness of physical therapeutic scoliosis exercise (PSSE) intervention for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.BMC musculoskeletal disorders · 2025Pooled it
- Pooled it
- Comparative efficacy of six types of scoliosis-specific exercises on adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.BMC musculoskeletal disorders · 2024Pooled it
- High-frequency ultrasonography in quantifying paraspinal muscle remodeling after Schroth therapy for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: a retrospective observational study.Scientific reports · 2026Observational
- Article
- Compliance of Physiotherapeutic Scoliosis-Specific Exercise in Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis: A Scoping Review.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Review
- 2D and 3D Classification Systems for Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis: Clinical Implications and Technological Advances.Orthopaedic surgery · 2025Review
- Effects of Physiotherapeutic Scoliosis-Specific Exercise for Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis Cobb Angle: A Systematic Review.Spine surgery and related research · 2025Review
- Systematic Review of Clinical Outcome Parameters of Conservative Treatment of Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis Patients.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Review
- The Immediate Effect of Hanging Exercise and Muscle Cylinder Exercise on the Angle of Trunk Rotation in Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Exercise therapy for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis rehabilitation: a bibliometric analysis (1999-2023).Frontiers in pediatrics · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
9 authors at 6 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeThe purpose of this study was to determine the feasibility and efficacy of a United States multi-site randomized control trial (RCT) of the Schroth-based therapy program in Risser 0 patients with mild adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) curves.
methodsSix sites enrolled 98 Risser 0 patients with single AIS curves between 12° and 24°. Patients were randomized to Exercise:Control group in a 2:1 ratio. Exercise group patients were instructed on the Schroth-based method and a home exercise program of 75 min/week for 1 year.
resultsEnrollment across 6 institutions averaged 2.2 patients per month over 45 months. Patient attrition was 42% after 1 year (41/98) and 52% after 2 years (51/98). Exercise group patients were significantly younger (11.6 vs 12.5 years) without differences in the baseline Cobb angle (16.2° vs 17.1°). Self-reported exercise adherence averaged 82% at 6 months and 63% at 1 year (n = 35). A significantly lower frequency of patients was braced in the Exercise group after 1 year (26% vs 55%, p = 0.03) but not after 2 years (48% vs 63%, p = 0.31). Curve magnitude changes between groups were not significant after 1 and 2 years.
conclusionPerforming a multi-site RCT for mild AIS in the United States is challenging with slow enrollment and high attrition. Young patients with small curves have difficulty adhering to the intensive demands of Schroth-based therapy. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: II.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.