ArticleLa Radiologia medica2023
Prospective intraindividual comparison of a standard 2D TSE MRI protocol for ankle imaging and a deep learning-based 2D TSE MRI protocol with a scan time reduction of 48.
Article in La Radiologia medica, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.
- Comparison of Deep-Learning-Based Reconstruction of Knee MRI with Conventional Sequences in Patients with Knee Pain.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- AI Revolution in Radiology, Radiation Oncology and Nuclear Medicine: Transforming and Innovating the Radiological Sciences.Journal of medical imaging and radiation oncology · 2025Review
- Deep learning image enhancement for confident diagnosis of TMJ osteoarthritis in zero-TE MR imaging.Dento maxillo facial radiology · 2025Article
- Prospective and multi-reader evaluation of deep learning reconstruction-based accelerated rectal MRI: image quality, diagnostic performance, and reading time.European radiology · 2024Article
- Conceptual review of outcome metrics and measures used in clinical evaluation of artificial intelligence in radiology.La Radiologia medica · 2024Review
- Application research of AI-assisted compressed sensing technology in MRI scanning of the knee joint: 3D-MRI perspective.European radiology · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeMagnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scan time remains a limited and valuable resource. This study evaluates the diagnostic performance of a deep learning (DL)-based accelerated TSE study protocol compared to a standard TSE study protocol in ankle MRI. MATERIAL AND
methodsBetween October 2020 and July 2021 forty-seven patients were enrolled in this study for an intraindividual comparison of a standard TSE study protocol and a DL TSE study protocol either on a 1.5 T or a 3 T scanner. Two radiologists evaluated the examinations regarding structural pathologies and image quality categories (5-point-Likert-scale; 1 = "non diagnostic", 5 = "excellent").
resultsBoth readers showed almost perfect/perfect agreement of DL TSE with standard TSE in all analyzed structural pathologies (0.81-1.00) with a median "good" or "excellent" rating (4-5/5) in all image quality categories in both 1.5 T and 3 T MRI. The reduction of total acquisition time of DL TSE compared to standard TSE was 49% in 1.5 T and 48% in 3 T MRI to a total acquisition time of 5 min 41 s and 5 min 46 s.
conclusionIn ankle MRI the new DL-based accelerated TSE study protocol delivers high agreement with standard TSE and high image quality, while reducing the acquisition time by 48%.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.