Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36806880›Full record

SynthesisJAMA pediatrics2023

Global Proportion of Disordered Eating in Children and Adolescents: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

José Francisco López-Gil, Antonio García-Hermoso, Lee Smith, Joseph Firth, Mike Trott, Arthur Eumann Mesas, Estela Jiménez-López, Héctor Gutiérrez-Espinoza, Pedro J Tárraga-López, Desirée Victoria-Montesinos

Open access · bronzeAbstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in JAMA pediatrics, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 132 papers, 9 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
132citing papers in PubMed, 9 pooled it
68.0field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

132 citing papers in PubMed, 9 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 217 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Pooled it
  9. Pooled it
  10. Article
  11. Observational
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

72 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 7 institutions in 5 countries.

José Francisco López-GilHealth and Social Research Center, Universidad de Castilla-La Mancha, Cuenca, Spain.
Antonio García-HermosoNavarrabiomed, Hospital Universitario de Navarra (HUN), Universidad Pública de Navarra (UPNA), IdiSNA, Pamplona, Navarra, Spain.
Lee SmithCentre for Health, Performance and Wellbeing, Anglia Ruskin University, Cambridge, United Kingdom.
Joseph FirthDivision of Psychology and Mental Health, University of Manchester, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Manchester, United Kingdom.
Mike TrottCentre for Health, Performance and Wellbeing, Anglia Ruskin University, Cambridge, United Kingdom.
Arthur Eumann MesasHealth and Social Research Center, Universidad de Castilla-La Mancha, Cuenca, Spain.
Estela Jiménez-LópezHealth and Social Research Center, Universidad de Castilla-La Mancha, Cuenca, Spain.
Héctor Gutiérrez-EspinozaEscuela de Fisioterapia, Universidad de las Américas, Quito, Ecuador.
Pedro J Tárraga-LópezFaculty of Nursing, Universidad de Castilla-La Mancha, Albacete, Spain.
Desirée Victoria-MontesinosFaculty of Health Sciences, San Antonio Catholic University of Murcia, Murcia, Spain.
University of Castilla-La Mancha · ESAnglia Ruskin University · GBGreater Manchester Mental Health NHS Foundation Trust · GBHarvard University · USNavarrabiomed · ESUniversidad de Las Américas · ECUniversidad de Murcia · ES

Funding

Medical Research Council MR/T021780/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: The 5-item Sick, Control, One, Fat, Food (SCOFF) questionnaire is the most widely used screening measure for eating disorders. However, no previous systematic review and meta-analysis determined the proportion of disordered eating among children and adolescents. Objective: To establish the proportion among children and adolescents of disordered eating as assessed with the SCOFF tool. Data Sources: Four databases were systematically searched (PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library) with date limits from January 1999 to November 2022. Study Selection: Studies were required to meet the following criteria: (1) participants: studies of community samples of children and adolescents aged 6 to 18 years and (2) outcome: disordered eating assessed by the SCOFF questionnaire. The exclusion criteria included (1) studies conducted with young people who had a diagnosis of physical or mental disorders; (2) studies that were published before 1999 because the SCOFF questionnaire was designed in that year; (3) studies in which data were collected during COVID-19 because they could introduce selection bias; (4) studies based on data from the same surveys/studies to avoid duplication; and (5) systematic reviews and/or meta-analyses and qualitative and case studies. Data Extraction and Synthesis: A systematic review and meta-analysis was performed according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses (PRISMA) reporting guideline. Main Outcomes and Measures: Proportion of disordered eating among children and adolescents assessed with the SCOFF tool. Results: Thirty-two studies, including 63 181 participants, from 16 countries were included in this systematic review and meta-analysis. The overall proportion of children and adolescents with disordered eating was 22.36% (95% CI, 18.84%-26.09%; P < .001; n = 63 181) (I2 = 98.58%). Girls were significantly more likely to report disordered eating (30.03%; 95% CI, 25.61%-34.65%; n = 27 548) than boys (16.98%; 95% CI, 13.46%-20.81%; n = 26 170) (P < .001). Disordered eating became more elevated with increasing age (B, 0.03; 95% CI, 0-0.06; P = .049) and body mass index (B, 0.03; 95% CI, 0.01-0.05; P < .001). Conclusions and Relevance: In this systematic review and meta-analysis, the available evidence from 32 studies comprising large samples from 16 countries showed that 22% of children and adolescents showed disordered eating according to the SCOFF tool. Proportion of disordered eating was further elevated among girls, as well as with increasing age and body mass index. These high figures are concerning from a public health perspective and highlight the need to implement strategies for preventing eating disorders.

Indexed as

COVID-19Feeding and Eating DisordersAdolescentBody Mass IndexChildFemaleHumansMaleSurveys and Questionnaires

Identifiers

PMID36806880
PMCPMC9941974
OpenAlexW4321369791

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.