ArticleExperimental eye research2023
Retinal electrophysiologic response to IOP elevation in living human eyes.
Article in Experimental eye research, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.
- Dangers of orbital retraction in transorbital neuroendoscopic surgery.Acta neurochirurgica · 2026Review
- Bilateral retinal dysfunction in Posner-Schlossman syndrome: subclinical abnormalities revealed by full-field electroretinography.Documenta ophthalmologica. Advances in ophthalmology · 2026Article
- Cholinergic Improvement of Low-Flow Segmental Aqueous Humor Outflow in Humans.Ophthalmology science · 2026Article
- Retinal cytoarchitecture is preserved in an organotypic perfused human and porcine eye model.Acta neuropathologica communications · 2024Article
- Serine to proline mutation at position 341 of MYOC impairs trabecular meshwork function by causing autophagy deregulation.Cell death discovery · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
purposeThe relationships between intraocular pressure (IOP), ocular perfusion pressure (OPP), retinal perfusion, and retinal electrophysiologic responses have been explored experimentally across several animal models. These studies have demonstrated that elevated IOP reduces OPP, and when this reduction in OPP exceeds the autoregulatory capacity of the retina vasculature, retinal perfusion and electrophysiologic responses are reduced. This study aimed to evaluate these interactions for the first time in the living human eye.
methodsFive eyes from three research-consented brain-dead organ donors underwent optical coherence tomography with angiographic (OCT/A; Spectralis, Heidelberg Engineering) and electroretinographic (ERG, Diagnosys LLC) measurements while IOP was manometrically-elevated stepwise to pressures of 10, 30 and 50 mmHg. Systemic blood pressure (BP) was monitored continuously during testing. Correlation analysis was applied to assess association between ERG and OPP changes. In a single eye, prolonged IOP elevation was induced with viscoelastic injection and serial ERG measurements were obtained.
resultsReductions in inner retinal function defined by photopic ERG were observed with elevation in IOP and concomitant reduction in OPP. Reductions, especially in b-wave, and photopic negative response (PhNR) amplitudes and implicit times were significantly correlated with elevation in IOP and reduction in OPP. There were more appreciable changes in perfusion and functional responses in eyes tested while systemic blood pressure was lower. With prolonged IOP elevation, selective loss of the PhNR response was observed.
conclusionsIn the living human eye, retinal perfusion and inner retinal function are acutely impacted by elevation of IOP, and this impact is related to systemic BP and OPP. This novel approach provides a viable model to study the autoregulatory responses to IOP elevation in the living human eye.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.