ArticleExperimental eye research2023
Effect of graphene-based nanomaterials on corneal wound healing in vitro.
Article in Experimental eye research, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
- The Role and Future of Functional Graphenic Materials in Biomedical and Human Health Applications.Biomacromolecules · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
Graphene-based nanomaterials (GBNs) are widely used due to their chemical and physical properties for multiple commercial and environmental applications. From an occupational health perspective, there is concern regarding the effects of inhalation on the respiratory system, and many studies have been conducted to study inhalation impacts on lung. Similar to the respiratory system, the eyes may also be exposed to GBNs and thus impacted. In this study, immortalized human corneal epithelial (hTCEpi) cells and rabbit corneal fibroblasts (RCFs) were used to investigate the toxicity of eight types of GBN: graphene oxide (GO; 400 nm), GO (1 μm), partially reduced graphene oxide (PRGO; 400 nm), reduced graphene oxide (RGO; 400 nm), RGO (2 μm), graphene (110 nm), graphene (140 nm), and graphene (1 μm). We next examined the effects of these GBNs on hTCEpi cell migration. We also determined whether the expression of α-smooth muscle actin (αSMA), a myofibroblast marker, is altered by the GBNs using RCFs. We found that RGO (400 nm) and RGO (2 μm) were highly toxic to hTCEPi cells and RCFs meanwhile, PRGO (400 nm) was toxic only to hTCEpi cells. In addition, PRGO (400 nm), RGO (400 nm), and RGO (2 μm) inhibited hTCEpi cell migration and significantly increased αSMA mRNA expression. Further study in vivo is required to determine if RGO nanomaterials delay corneal epithelial healing and induce scar formation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.