Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36806503›Full record

ReviewJournal of Alzheimer's disease : JAD2023

Let's Not Repeat History's Mistakes: Two Cautions to Scientists on the Use of Race in Alzheimer's Disease and Alzheimer's Disease Related Dementias Research.

Shana D Stites, Norma B Coe

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of Alzheimer's disease : JAD, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
2.8field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. How reactions to a brain scan result differ for adults based on self-identified Black and White race.Alzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association · 2024
    Trial
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Shana D StitesDepartment of Psychiatry, Perlman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Norma B CoeDepartment of Medical Ethics and Health Policy, Perelman School of Medicine and Co-Director of the Population Aging Research Center (PARC), University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
University of Pennsylvania · US

Funding

STATISTICAL DATA ENCLAVE COREP30AG012836 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI COE, NORMA B, KOHLER, HANS-PETER · 1999 to 2024
$14.0M
Study of Cognitive Symptoms and Future Time Perspective in Preclinical Alzheimer's DiseaseK23AG065442 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI STITES, SHANA D. · 2020 to 2024
$886k
NIA Core Center to Build Neurodegenerative Disease Research Faculty At PennP30AG036468 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI TROJANOWSKI, JOHN Q. · 2009 to 2010
$805k
NIA NIH HHS K23 AG065442NIA NIH HHS P30 AG012836NIA NIH HHS P30 AG036468
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Alzheimer's disease and Alzheimer's disease related dementias (AD/ADRD) research has advanced gene and biomarker technologies to aid identification of individuals at risk for dementia. This innovation is a lynchpin in development of disease-modifying therapies. The emerging science could transform outcomes for patients and families. However, current limitations in the racial representation and inclusion of racial diversity in research limits the relevance of these technologies: AD/ADRD research cohorts used to define biomarker cutoffs are mostly White, despite clinical and epidemiologic research that shows Black populations are among those experiencing the greatest burdens of AD/ADRD. White cohorts alone are insufficient to characterize heterogeneity in disease and in life experiences that can alter AD/ADRD's courses. The National Institute on Aging (NIA) has called for increased racial diversity in AD/ADRD research. While scientists are working to implement NIA's plan to build more diverse research cohorts, they are also seeking out opportunities to consider race in AD/ADRD research. Recently, scientists have posed two ways of including race in AD/ADRD research: ancestry-based verification of race and race-based adjustment of biomarker test results. Both warrant careful examination for how they are impacting AD/ADRD science with respect to specific study objectives and the broader mission of the field. If these research methods are not grounded in pursuit of equity and justice, biases they introduce into AD/ADRD science could perpetuate, or even worsen, disparities in AD/ADRD research and care.

Indexed as

Alzheimer DiseaseDementiaBiomarkersBlack or African AmericanHumansNational Institute on Aging (U.S.)United StatesWhiteBiomarkersAlzheimer’s diseasebiomarkersgeneticspreclinical Alzheimer’sracismscientific discoveries

Identifiers

PMID36806503
PMCPMC10123855
OpenAlexW4321209521

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.