Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36806325›Full record

ArticleeLife2023

Sweepstakes reproductive success via pervasive and recurrent selective sweeps.

Einar Árnason, Jere Koskela, Katrín Halldórsdóttir, Bjarki Eldon

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in eLife, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
9.1field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 30 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Multiple merger coalescent inference of effective population size.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2025
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 4 institutions in 4 countries.

Einar ÁrnasonInstitute of Life- and environmental Sciences, University of Iceland, Reykjavik, Iceland.ORCID 0000-0003-3686-6407
Jere KoskelaDepartment of Statistics, University of Warwick, Coventry, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-2836-8777
Katrín HalldórsdóttirInstitute of Life- and environmental Sciences, University of Iceland, Reykjavik, Iceland.ORCID 0000-0002-9682-0286
Bjarki EldonLeibniz Institute for Evolution and Biodiversity Science, Museum für Naturkunde, Berlin, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-9354-2391
Harvard University · USMuseum für Naturkunde · DEUniversity of Iceland · ISUniversity of Warwick · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Highly fecund natural populations characterized by high early mortality abound, yet our knowledge about their recruitment dynamics is somewhat rudimentary. This knowledge gap has implications for our understanding of genetic variation, population connectivity, local adaptation, and the resilience of highly fecund populations. The concept of sweepstakes reproductive success, which posits a considerable variance and skew in individual reproductive output, is key to understanding the distribution of individual reproductive success. However, it still needs to be determined whether highly fecund organisms reproduce through sweepstakes and, if they do, the relative roles of neutral and selective sweepstakes. Here, we use coalescent-based statistical analysis of population genomic data to show that selective sweepstakes likely explain recruitment dynamics in the highly fecund Atlantic cod. We show that the Kingman coalescent (modelling no sweepstakes) and the Xi-Beta coalescent (modelling random sweepstakes), including complex demography and background selection, do not provide an adequate fit for the data. The Durrett-Schweinsberg coalescent, in which selective sweepstakes result from recurrent and pervasive selective sweeps of new mutations, offers greater explanatory power. Our results show that models of sweepstakes reproduction and multiple-merger coalescents are relevant and necessary for understanding genetic diversity in highly fecund natural populations. These findings have fundamental implications for understanding the recruitment variation of fish stocks and general evolutionary genomics of high-fecundity organisms.

Indexed as

FertilityReproductionAcclimatizationAnimalsBiological EvolutionGenomicsAtlantic codevolutionary biologygeneticsgenomicsmultiple-merger coalescentsrecruitment dynamicsreproductive sweepstakesselectionselective sweeps

Identifiers

PMID36806325
PMCPMC9940914
OpenAlexW4321372253

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.