Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36806297›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2023

Peak knee joint moments accurately predict medial and lateral knee contact forces in patients with valgus malalignment.

Jana Holder, Stefan van Drongelen, Scott David Uhlrich, Eva Herrmann, Andrea Meurer, Felix Stief

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Distal femoral morphology as a risk factor for osteoarthritis.Anatomical record (Hoboken, N.J. : 2007) · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Trabecular Architecture of the Proximal Tibia in Extant Hominids.American journal of biological anthropology · 2025
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Jana HolderMovement Analysis Laboratory, Department of Orthopedics (Friedrichsheim), University Hospital Frankfurt, Goethe University Frankfurt, Frankfurt/Main, Germany. jana.holder@plus.ac.at.
Stefan van DrongelenDr. Rolf M. Schwiete Research Unit for Osteoarthritis, Department of Orthopedics (Friedrichsheim), University Hospital Frankfurt, Goethe University Frankfurt, Frankfurt/Main, Germany.
Scott David UhlrichDepartment of Bioengineering, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA.
Eva HerrmannInstitute of Biostatistics and Mathematical Modeling, Goethe University Frankfurt, Frankfurt/Main, Germany.
Andrea MeurerDepartment of Orthopedics (Friedrichsheim), University Hospital Frankfurt, Goethe University Frankfurt, Frankfurt/Main, Germany.
Felix StiefMovement Analysis Laboratory, Department of Orthopedics (Friedrichsheim), University Hospital Frankfurt, Goethe University Frankfurt, Frankfurt/Main, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Compressive knee joint contact force during walking is thought to be related to initiation and progression of knee osteoarthritis. However, joint loading is often evaluated with surrogate measures, like the external knee adduction moment, due to the complexity of computing joint contact forces. Statistical models have shown promising correlations between medial knee joint contact forces and knee adduction moments in particularly in individuals with knee osteoarthritis or after total knee replacements (R

Indexed as

Arthroplasty, Replacement, KneeColeopteraOsteoarthritis, KneeAdolescentAnimalsChildCognitionHumansKnee JointPatients

Identifiers

PMID36806297
PMCPMC9938879

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.