ArticleScientific reports2023
Insect recognition based on complementary features from multiple views.
Article in Scientific reports, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.
- Multi-View Pareto Optimization for Minimal-Diagnostic-Set Identification of Disease Vectors.Insects · 2026Article
- MVBeetle: an interpretable multi-view deep learning model for fine-grained classification of Galerucinae and Alticinae (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae).Frontiers in plant science · 2026Article
- GradCAM-PestDetNet: A deep learning-based hybrid model with explainable AI for pest detection and classification.MethodsX · 2025Article
- Few-shot object detection for pest insects via features aggregation and contrastive learning.Frontiers in plant science · 2025Article
- Vision Measurement System for Gender-Based Counting ofSensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- AM-MSFF: A Pest Recognition Network Based on Attention Mechanism and Multi-Scale Feature Fusion.Entropy (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Insect pest recognition has always been a significant branch of agriculture and ecology. The slight variance among different kinds of insects in appearance makes it hard for human experts to recognize. It is increasingly imperative to finely recognize specific insects by employing machine learning methods. In this study, we proposed a feature fusion network to synthesize feature presentations in different backbone models. Firstly, we employed one CNN-based backbone ResNet, and two attention-based backbones Vision Transformer and Swin Transformer to localize the important regions of insect images with Grad-CAM. During this process, we designed new architectures for these two Transformers to enable Grad-CAM to be applicable in such attention-based models. Then we further proposed an attention-selection mechanism to reconstruct the attention area by delicately integrating the important regions, enabling these partial but key expressions to complement each other. We only need part of the image scope that represents the most crucial decision-making information for insect recognition. We randomly selected 20 species of insects from the IP102 dataset and then adopted all 102 kinds of insects to test the classification performance. Experimental results show that the proposed approach outperforms other advanced CNN-based models. More importantly, our attention-selection mechanism demonstrates good robustness to augmented images.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.