ArticleScientific reports2023
The importance of temporal-fine structure to perceive time-compressed speech with and without the restoration of the syllabic rhythm.
Article in Scientific reports, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Retrospective duration judgments of naturalistic events depend on memories of event boundaries.Psychonomic bulletin & review · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Intelligibility of time-compressed (TC) speech decreases with increasing speech rate. However, intelligibility can be restored by 'repackaging' the TC speech by inserting silences between the syllables so that the original 'rhythm' is restored. Although restoration of the speech rhythm affects solely the temporal envelope, it is unclear to which extent repackaging also affects the perception of the temporal-fine structure (TFS). Here we investigate to which extent TFS contributes to the perception of TC and repackaged TC speech in quiet. Intelligibility of TC sentences with a speech rate of 15.6 syllables per second (sps) and the repackaged sentences, by adding 100 ms of silence between the syllables of the TC speech (i.e., a speech rate of 6.1 sps), was assessed for three TFS conditions: the original TFS and the TFS conveyed by an 8- and 16-channel noise vocoder. An overall positive effect on intelligibility of both the repackaging process and of the amount of TFS available to the listener was observed. Furthermore, the benefit associated with the repackaging TC speech depended on the amount of TFS available. The results show TFS contributes significantly to the perception of fast speech even when the overall rhythm/envelope of TC speech is restored.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.