Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36806143›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2023

Examining the levels of psychological support available to patients with haematological cancer in England: a mixed methods study.

Jo Brett, Catherine Henshall, Paul Dawson, Graham P Collins, Anke Ehlers, Tracy Mitchell-Floyd, Anya Aspinall, Catriona Gilmour-Hamilton, Kate Robinson, Eila Watson

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Jo BrettHealth and Life Sciences, Oxford Brookes University, Oxford, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-5116-4238
Catherine HenshallHealth and Life Sciences, Oxford Brookes University, Oxford, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-5659-3296
Paul DawsonHealth and Life Sciences, Oxford Brookes University, Oxford, UK.
Graham P CollinsClinical Haematology, Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford, UK.
Anke EhlersExperimental Psychology, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
Tracy Mitchell-FloydClinical Haematology, Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford, UK.
Anya AspinallClinical Haematology, Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford, UK.
Catriona Gilmour-HamiltonHaematology Department, Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford, UK.
Kate RobinsonPatient and Public Involvement, Oxford Brookes University, Oxford, UK.
Eila WatsonHealth and Life Sciences, Oxford Brookes University, Oxford, UK ewatson@brookes.ac.uk.ORCID 0000-0002-3592-1315
Oxford Brookes University · GBOxford University Hospitals NHS Trust · GBUniversity of Oxford · GB

Funding

Blood Cancer UK 2019
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesThe psychological impact of a haematological malignancy is well documented. However, few studies have assessed the provision of psychological support to people with these diagnoses. This study explores the extent and nature of psychological support for people diagnosed with haematological cancer to inform future service provision.

designThis study consisted of an online survey with healthcare professionals (phase 1) and qualitative interviews with patients (phase 2) and key health professionals (phase 3). A descriptive analysis of survey data and thematic analysis of interviews were conducted.

participantsTwo hundred health professionals practising in England completed the survey. Twenty-five interviews were conducted with people diagnosed with haematological cancer in the past 3 years, and 10 with key health professionals, including haematologists, cancer nurse specialists and psychologists were conducted. PRIMARY OUTCOME MEASURES: Level of psychological assessment undertaken with people with haematological cancer, and level and nature of psychological support provided.

resultsLess than half (47.3%) of survey respondents strongly agreed/agreed that their patients were well supported in terms of their psychological well-being and approximately half (49.4%) reported providing routine assessment of psychological needs of patients, most commonly at the time of diagnosis or relapse. Patients described their need for psychological support, their experiences of support from health professionals and their experiences of support from psychological therapy services. There was considerable variation in the support patients described receiving. Barriers to providing psychological support reported by health professionals included time, skills, resources and patient barriers. Most doctors (85%) and 40% of nurse respondents reported receiving no training for assessing and managing psychological needs.

conclusionsPsychological well-being should be routinely assessed, and person-centred support should be offered regularly throughout the haematological cancer journey. Greater provision of healthcare professional training in this area and better integration of psychological support services into the patient care pathway are required.

Indexed as

Hematologic NeoplasmsNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalCounselingEnglandHealth PersonnelHumansadult psychiatryhaematologyleukaemialymphomaoncology

Identifiers

PMID36806143
PMCPMC9943904
OpenAlexW4321370863

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.