Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36806138›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2023

Maternal death surveillance efforts: notification and review coverage rates in 30 low-income and middle-income countries, 2015-2019.

Florina Serbanescu, Jean-Pierre Monet, Lillian Whiting-Collins, A C Moran, Jason Hsia, Michel Brun

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Florina SerbanescuDivision of Reproductive Health, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, USA fxs7@cdc.gov.ORCID 0000-0003-2140-5499
Jean-Pierre MonetTechnical Division, United Nations Population Fund, New York, New York, USA.
Lillian Whiting-CollinsDivision of Reproductive Health, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.
A C MoranDepartment of Maternal, Newborn, Child and Adolescent Health, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland.
Jason HsiaDivision of Population Health, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.
Michel BrunTechnical Division, United Nations Population Fund, New York, New York, USA.

Funding

World Health Organization 001
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivePerformance of maternal death surveillance and response (MDSR) relies on the system's ability to identify and notify all maternal deaths and its ability to review all maternal deaths by a committee. Unified definitions for indicators to assess these functions are lacking. We aim to estimate notification and review coverage rates in 30 countries between 2015 and 2019 using standardised definitions.

designRepeat cross-sectional surveys provided the numerators for the coverage indicators; United Nations (UN)-modelled expected country maternal deaths provided the denominators.

setting30 low-income and middle-income countries responding to the Maternal Health Thematic Fund annual surveys conducted by the UN Population Fund between 2015 and 2019. OUTCOME MEASURES: Notification coverage rate ([Formula: see text]) was calculated as the proportion of expected maternal deaths that were notified at the national level annually; review coverage rate ([Formula: see text]) was calculated as the proportion of expected maternal deaths that were reviewed annually.

resultsThe average annual [Formula: see text] for all countries increased from 17% in 2015 to 28% in 2019; the average annual [Formula: see text] increased from 8% to 13%. Between 2015 and 2019, 22 countries (73%) reported increases in the [Formula: see text]-with an average increase of 20 (SD 18) percentage points-and 24 countries (80%) reported increases in [Formula: see text] by 7 (SD 11) percentage points. Low values of [Formula: see text] contrasts with country-published review rates, ranging from 46% to 51%.

conclusionMDSR systems that count and review all maternal deaths can deliver real-time information that could prompt immediate actions and may improve maternal health. Consistent and systematic documentation of MDSR efforts may improve national and global monitoring. Assessing the notification and review functions using coverage indicators is feasible, not affected by fluctuations in data completeness and reporting, and can objectively capture progress.

Indexed as

Maternal DeathCross-Sectional StudiesDeveloping CountriesFemaleHumansMaternal MortalityPovertyHEALTH SERVICES ADMINISTRATION & MANAGEMENTInternational health servicesMaternal medicinePUBLIC HEALTH

Identifiers

PMID36806138
PMCPMC9944275

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.