Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36806132›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2023

Family coaching during Spontaneous Awakening Trials and Spontaneous Breathing Trials (FamCAB): pilot study protocol.

Anmol Shahid, Corson Johnstone, Bonnie G Sept, Shelly Kupsch, Andrea Soo, Kirsten M Fiest, Henry Thomas Stelfox

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Anmol ShahidDepartment of Critical Care Medicine, University of Calgary & Alberta Health Services, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.ORCID 0000-0001-5638-4988
Corson JohnstoneDepartment of Critical Care Medicine, University of Calgary & Alberta Health Services, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.
Bonnie G SeptDepartment of Critical Care Medicine, University of Calgary & Alberta Health Services, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.
Shelly KupschDepartment of Critical Care Medicine, University of Calgary & Alberta Health Services, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.
Andrea SooDepartment of Critical Care Medicine, University of Calgary & Alberta Health Services, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.
Kirsten M FiestDepartment of Critical Care Medicine, University of Calgary & Alberta Health Services, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-7299-6594
Henry Thomas StelfoxDepartment of Critical Care Medicine, University of Calgary & Alberta Health Services, Calgary, Alberta, Canada tom.stelfox@ahs.ca.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionMany patients in the intensive care unit (ICU) require weaning from deep sedation (Spontaneous Awakening Trials, SATs) and mechanical ventilation (Spontaneous Breathing Trials, SBTs) in their journey to recovery. These procedures can be distressing for patients and their families. The presence of family members as 'coaches' during SATs/SBTs could provide patients with reassurance, reduce stress for patients and families and potentially improve procedural success rates. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This study will be executed in two phases:Development of a coaching module: a working group including patient partners (i.e., former ICU patients or family members of former ICU patients), researchers, and ICU clinicians will develop an educational module on family coaching during SATs/SBTs (FamCAB). This module will provide families of critically ill patients basic information about SATs/SBTs as well as coaching guidance.Pilot testing: family members of ICU patients will complete the FamCAB module and provide information on: (1) demographics, (2) anxiety and (3) satisfaction with care in the ICU. Family members will then coach the patient through the next clinically indicated SATs and/or SBTs. Information around duration of time and success rates of SATs and/or SBTs (ability to conduct a complete assessment) alongside feedback will be collected. ICU clinical staff (including physicians and nurses) will be asked for feedback on practicality and perceived benefits or drawbacks of family coaching during these procedures. Feasibility and acceptability of family coaching in SATs/SBTs will be determined. DISCUSSION: The results of this work will inform whether a larger study to explore family coaching during SATs/SBTs is warranted. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: This study has received ethical approval from the University of Calgary Conjoint Health Research Ethics Board. Results from this pilot study will be made available via peer-reviewed journals and presented at critical care conferences on completion.

Indexed as

MentoringCritical CareHumansIntensive Care UnitsPilot ProjectsRespiration, ArtificialAdult anaesthesiaINTENSIVE & CRITICAL CAREQuality in health care

Identifiers

PMID36806132
PMCPMC9943692

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.