Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36806057›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology2023

Positive intrathecal anti-Borrelia antibody synthesis: what are the implications for clinical practice? Clinical features and outcomes of 138 patients in a French multicenter cohort study.

Pauline Naudion, Alice Raffetin, Souheil Zayet, Timothée Klopfenstein, Elisabeth Baux, Martin Martinot, Lionel Piroth, Eric Caumes, Catherine Chirouze, Kevin Bouiller

Abstract readMulticenter Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Lyme borreliosis.Nature reviews. Disease primers · 2026
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 8 institutions in 2 countries.

Pauline NaudionDepartment of Infectious Diseases, CHU Besançon, 3 Bd Alexandre Fleming, 25030, Besançon, France.
Alice RaffetinDepartment of Infectious Diseases, Tick-Borne Diseases Reference Center, Paris and Northern Region, General Hospital of Villeneuve-Saint-Georges, 40 Allée de La Source, 94 190, Villeneuve-Saint-Georges, France. alice.raffetin@chiv.fr.
Souheil ZayetDepartment of Infectious Diseases, General Hospital of Nord Franche-Comté, Belfort, France.
Timothée KlopfensteinDepartment of Infectious Diseases, General Hospital of Nord Franche-Comté, Belfort, France.
Elisabeth BauxDepartment of Infectious Diseases, University Hospital of Nancy, Nancy, France.
Martin MartinotDepartment of Infectious Diseases, General Hospital of Colmar, Colmar, France.
Lionel PirothDepartment of Infectious Diseases, University Hospital of Dijon, Dijon, France.
Eric CaumesDepartment of Infectious Diseases, University Hospital of Pitié-Salpétrière, Assistance Publique des Hôpitaux de Paris (AP-HP), Paris, France.
Catherine ChirouzeDepartment of Infectious Diseases, CHU Besançon, 3 Bd Alexandre Fleming, 25030, Besançon, France.
Kevin BouillerDepartment of Infectious Diseases, CHU Besançon, 3 Bd Alexandre Fleming, 25030, Besançon, France. kbouiller@chu-besancon.fr.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2177-4318
Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique · FRL'Hôpital Nord Franche-Comté · FRCentre Hospitalier Régional et Universitaire de Nancy · FRCentre Hospitalier Universitaire de Besançon · FRÉcole Nationale Vétérinaire d'Alfort · FRHopitaux Civils de Colmar · FRInserm · FRMaison des Sciences sociales et des Humanités de Dijon · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We aimed to describe the clinical characteristics, management, and residual symptoms (RS) in patients with definite and possible Lyme neuroborreliosis (LNB). We conducted a retrospective French multicenter cohort study (2010-2020). Cases of LNB were defined as clinical manifestations attributed to LNB and a positive Borrelia-specific intrathecal antibody index (AI) ("possible" LNB) and with pleocytosis ("definite" LNB). Risk factors of RS were determined using a logistic regression model. We included 138 adult patients with a positive AI. Mean age was 59.5 years (± 14.7). The median duration of symptoms before diagnosis was 1.0 [0.5-4.0] months. The most frequent manifestation was radicular pain (n = 79, 57%). Complete cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) leukocyte analysis was available in 131 patients, of whom 72 (55%) had pleocytosis. Patients with definite LNB had a shorter duration of symptoms (median 1.0 [0.5-2.6] vs. 3.0 [0.6-7.0] months, p < 0.01) and more radicular pain (74% vs 44%, p < 0.01) than patients with possible LNB. At the last visit (median duration of follow-up: 70 [30-175] days), 74/124 patients (59.7%) reported RS, mostly radicular pain (n = 31, 25%). In multivariate analysis, definite LNB (OR = 0.21 [0.05-0.931], p = 0.039) and duration of symptoms less than 3 months (OR = 0.04 [0.01-0.37], p = 0.005) were protective factors against RS at last follow-up. Our study highlights the challenges of LNB management, especially for patients with a positive AI without pleocytosis, questioning whether LB is still ongoing or not. Early diagnosis and treatment are important to improve outcomes and to lower potential RS.

Indexed as

BorreliaLyme NeuroborreliosisAdultChemokine CXCL13Cohort StudiesHumansLeukocytosisMiddle AgedPainRetrospective StudiesChemokine CXCL13Antibody indexBorreliaLyme neuroborreliosisResidual symptoms

Identifiers

PMID36806057
OpenAlexW4321436454

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.