ReviewCurrent cardiology reports2023
Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Fingerprinting: Potential Clinical Applications.
Review in Current cardiology reports, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Neural networks with personalized training for improved MOLLI TBMC medical imaging · 2025Article
- Impact of cardiovascular magnetic resonance in single ventricle physiology: a narrative review.Cardiovascular diagnosis and therapy · 2024Review
- Next-Generation Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Imaging Techniques for Characterization of Myocardial Disease.Current treatment options in cardiovascular medicine · 2024Article
- Quantifying 3D MR fingerprinting (3D-MRF) reproducibility across subjects, sessions, and scanners automatically using MNI atlases.Magnetic resonance in medicine · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purpose of reviewCardiac magnetic resonance fingerprinting (cMRF) has developed as a technique for rapid, multi-parametric tissue property mapping that has potential to both improve cardiac MRI exam efficiency and expand the information captured. In this review, we describe the cMRF technique, summarize technical developments and in vivo reports, and highlight potential clinical applications. RECENT
findingsTechnical developments in cMRF continue to progress rapidly, including motion compensated reconstruction, additional tissue property quantification, signal time course analysis, and synthetic LGE image generation. Such technical developments can enable simplified CMR protocols by combining multiple evaluations into a single protocol and reducing the number of breath-held scans. cMRF continues to be reported for use in a range of pathologies; however barriers to clinical implementation remain. Technical developments are described in this review, followed by a focus on potential clinical applications that they may support. Clinical translation of cMRF could shorten protocols, improve CMR accessibility, and provide additional information as compared to conventional cardiac parametric mapping methods. Current needs for clinical implementation are discussed, as well as how those needs may be met in order to bring cMRF from its current research setting to become a viable tool for patient care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.