ArticleEuropean journal of medical research2023
Clinical efficacy and complications of transurethral resection of the prostate versus plasmakinetic enucleation of the prostate.
Article in European journal of medical research, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 13 citations in OpenAlex.
- Reoperation after surgical treatment for benign prostatic hyperplasia: a systematic review.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2023Pooled it
- A propensity score-matched comparison of medium- to long-term outcomes between plasmakinetic enucleation of the prostate and transurethral resection of the prostate for benign prostatic hyperplasia.Translational andrology and urology · 2026Article
- Disease Progression and Outcomes in Patients With Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia: Protocol for a Multicenter Retrospective Cohort Study.JMIR research protocols · 2026Article
- The Impact of Transurethral Enucleation Therapeutic Approach in All-Size Benign Prostatic Obstruction Pathology: From Contemporary Technological Advances to Evidence-Based Clinical Progresses.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Retrospective study on prevention of bladder neck contracture by local injection of betamethasone after transurethral resection of the prostate in patients with small-volume prostate.Frontiers in surgery · 2025Article
- Analysis of urinary retention after endoscopic prostate enucleation and its subsequent impact on surgical outcomes.World journal of urology · 2024Article
- Effects of resection volume on postoperative micturition symptoms and retreatment after transurethral resection of the prostate.World journal of urology · 2023Observational
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundBenign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) is a common disease in elderly males, and many kinds of minimally invasive procedures can be used for the treatment of BPH. However, various procedures have caused some controversies regarding clinical outcomes, so more studies are needed to validate these controversial topics.
aimsThis study aimed to explore differences of clinical efficacy, surgical features, and complications between transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP) and plasmakinetic enucleation of the prostate (PKEP) for BPH.
methodsA total of eligible 850 cases of BPH underwent TURP (the TURP group, 320 cases) or PKEP (the PKEP group, 530 cases) in the urology department of our hospital from March 2015 to 2018 were involved in this study. Then, the baseline data, surgical characteristics, IPSS, QoL, PVR, Q
resultsThe operative time, intraoperative irrigation volume, postoperative hemoglobin, decrease in hemoglobin, postoperative irrigation time and volume, catheterization time, and hospital stay of the PKEP group were significantly less than those of the TURP group (all P < 0.05). At 3 months, 1, 2, and 3 years after operation, no significant differences were observed in IPSS, QoL, PVR, but the results of Q
conclusionThe clinical efficacy of PKEP is compared favorably with TURP during midterm follow-up. Given the merits such as less blood loss and hospital stay, lower complications, PKEP should be given a priority for BPH.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.