Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36805632›Full record

ArticleClinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research2023

Functional Homologous Recombination Assay on FFPE Specimens of Advanced High-Grade Serous Ovarian Cancer Predicts Clinical Outcomes.

Sanna Pikkusaari, Manuela Tumiati, Anni Virtanen, Jaana Oikkonen, Yilin Li, Fernando Perez-Villatoro, Taru Muranen, Matilda Salko, Kaisa Huhtinen, Anna Kanerva and 12 more

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
6.0field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 26 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

22 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Sanna PikkusaariResearch Program in Systems Oncology, Research Programs Unit, Faculty of Medicine, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland.ORCID 0000-0002-2966-0446
Manuela TumiatiResearch Program in Systems Oncology, Research Programs Unit, Faculty of Medicine, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland.ORCID 0000-0003-4889-3445
Anni VirtanenDepartment of Pathology, University of Helsinki and HUS Diagnostic Center, Helsinki University Hospital, Helsinki, Finland.ORCID 0000-0002-7467-8434
Jaana OikkonenResearch Program in Systems Oncology, Research Programs Unit, Faculty of Medicine, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland.ORCID 0000-0002-1063-2736
Yilin LiResearch Program in Systems Oncology, Research Programs Unit, Faculty of Medicine, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland.ORCID 0000-0002-3268-1969
Fernando Perez-VillatoroResearch Program in Systems Oncology, Research Programs Unit, Faculty of Medicine, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland.ORCID 0000-0002-5419-8484
Taru MuranenResearch Program in Systems Oncology, Research Programs Unit, Faculty of Medicine, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland.ORCID 0000-0002-5895-1808
Matilda SalkoResearch Program in Systems Oncology, Research Programs Unit, Faculty of Medicine, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland.ORCID 0000-0003-2548-8017
Kaisa HuhtinenResearch Program in Systems Oncology, Research Programs Unit, Faculty of Medicine, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland.ORCID 0000-0001-9685-5246
Anna KanervaDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Helsinki University Hospital, Helsinki, Finland.ORCID 0000-0003-3355-7393
Heidi KoskelaDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Turku University Hospital, Turku, Finland.ORCID 0000-0003-1034-1581
Johanna TapperDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Helsinki University Hospital, Helsinki, Finland.ORCID 0000-0002-1352-639X
Riitta Koivisto-KoranderDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Helsinki University Hospital, Helsinki, Finland.ORCID 0000-0003-4457-9002
Titta JoutsiniemiDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Turku University Hospital, Turku, Finland.ORCID 0000-0003-2169-9933
Ulla-Maija HaltiaDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Helsinki University Hospital, Helsinki, Finland.ORCID 0000-0003-1629-6400
Heini LassusDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Helsinki University Hospital, Helsinki, Finland.ORCID 0000-0003-0598-5147
Sampsa HautaniemiResearch Program in Systems Oncology, Research Programs Unit, Faculty of Medicine, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland.ORCID 0000-0002-7749-2694
Anniina FärkkiläResearch Program in Systems Oncology, Research Programs Unit, Faculty of Medicine, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland.ORCID 0000-0002-3558-6617
Johanna HynninenDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Turku University Hospital, Turku, Finland.ORCID 0000-0002-0854-7225
Sakari HietanenDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Turku University Hospital, Turku, Finland.ORCID 0000-0003-4734-4743
Olli CarpénResearch Program in Systems Oncology, Research Programs Unit, Faculty of Medicine, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland.ORCID 0000-0002-7847-5706
Liisa KauppiResearch Program in Systems Oncology, Research Programs Unit, Faculty of Medicine, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland.ORCID 0000-0002-6759-8997
University of Helsinki · FITurku University Hospital · FI

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeDeficiency in homologous recombination (HR) repair of DNA damage is characteristic of many high-grade serous ovarian cancers (HGSC). It is imperative to identify patients with homologous recombination-deficient (HRD) tumors as they are most likely to benefit from platinum-based chemotherapy and PARP inhibitors (PARPi). Existing methods measure historical, not necessarily current HRD and/or require high tumor cell content, which is not achievable for many patients. We set out to develop a clinically feasible assay for identifying functionally HRD tumors that can predict clinical outcomes. EXPERIMENTAL

designWe quantified RAD51, a key HR protein, in immunostained formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded (FFPE) tumor samples obtained from chemotherapy-naïve and neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT)-treated HGSC patients. We defined cutoffs for functional HRD separately for these sample types, classified the patients accordingly as HRD or HR-proficient, and analyzed correlations with clinical outcomes. From the same specimens, genomics-based HRD estimates (HR gene mutations, genomic signatures, and genomic scars) were also determined, and compared with functional HR (fHR) status.

resultsfHR status significantly predicted several clinical outcomes, including progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS), when determined from chemo-naïve (PFS, P < 0.0001; OS, P < 0.0001) as well as NACT-treated (PFS, P < 0.0001; OS, P = 0.0033) tumor specimens. The fHR test also identified as HRD those PARPi-at-recurrence-treated patients with longer OS (P = 0.0188).

conclusionsWe developed an fHR assay performed on routine FFPE specimens, obtained from either chemo-naïve or NACT-treated HGSC patients, that can significantly predict real-world platinum-based chemotherapy and PARPi response. See related commentary by Garg and Oza, p. 2957.

Indexed as

Ovarian NeoplasmsCarcinoma, Ovarian EpithelialFemaleHomologous RecombinationHumansMutationPoly(ADP-ribose) Polymerase InhibitorsRecombinational DNA RepairPoly(ADP-ribose) Polymerase Inhibitors

Identifiers

PMID36805632
PMCPMC10425726
OpenAlexW4321367056

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.