Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36805366›Full record

ArticleJMIR public health and surveillance2023

Prediction of Suicidal Behaviors in the Middle-aged Population: Machine Learning Analyses of UK Biobank.

Junren Wang, Jiajun Qiu, Ting Zhu, Yu Zeng, Huazhen Yang, Yanan Shang, Jin Yin, Yajing Sun, Yuanyuan Qu, Unnur A Valdimarsdóttir and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR public health and surveillance, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
4.4field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Indirect, machine learning-based suicide risk screening: Evidence from cross-National Validation.European psychiatry : the journal of the Association of European Psychiatrists · 2026
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 3 institutions in 4 countries.

Junren Wang *West China Biomedical Big Data Center, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.ORCID 0000-0001-6612-1671
Jiajun Qiu *West China Biomedical Big Data Center, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.ORCID 0000-0002-0972-9338
Ting ZhuWest China Biomedical Big Data Center, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.ORCID 0000-0001-6273-8148
Yu ZengWest China Biomedical Big Data Center, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.ORCID 0000-0002-0593-7551
Huazhen YangWest China Biomedical Big Data Center, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.ORCID 0000-0003-4515-1446
Yanan ShangWest China Biomedical Big Data Center, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.ORCID 0000-0002-3105-9959
Jin YinWest China Biomedical Big Data Center, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.ORCID 0000-0002-8607-091X
Yajing SunWest China Biomedical Big Data Center, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.ORCID 0000-0003-4286-7422
Yuanyuan QuWest China Biomedical Big Data Center, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.ORCID 0000-0002-3211-7671
Unnur A ValdimarsdóttirCenter of Public Health Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, University of Iceland, Reykjavík, Iceland.ORCID 0000-0001-5382-946X
Huan SongWest China Biomedical Big Data Center, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.ORCID 0000-0003-3845-8079
Sichuan University · CNHarvard University · USUniversity of Iceland · IS

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSuicidal behaviors, including suicide deaths and attempts, are major public health concerns. However, previous suicide models required a huge amount of input features, resulting in limited applicability in clinical practice.

objectiveWe aimed to construct applicable models (ie, with limited features) for short- and long-term suicidal behavior prediction. We further validated these models among individuals with different genetic risks of suicide.

methodsBased on the prospective cohort of UK Biobank, we included 223 (0.06%) eligible cases of suicide attempts or deaths, according to hospital inpatient or death register data within 1 year from baseline and randomly selected 4460 (1.18%) controls (1:20) without such records. We similarly identified 833 (0.22%) cases of suicidal behaviors 1 to 6 years from baseline and 16,660 (4.42%) corresponding controls. Based on 143 input features, mainly including sociodemographic, environmental, and psychosocial factors; medical history; and polygenic risk scores (PRS) for suicidality, we applied a bagged balanced light gradient-boosting machine (LightGBM) with stratified 10-fold cross-validation and grid-search to construct the full prediction models for suicide attempts or deaths within 1 year or between 1 and 6 years. The Shapley Additive Explanations (SHAP) approach was used to quantify the importance of input features, and the top 20 features with the highest SHAP values were selected to train the applicable models. The external validity of the established models was assessed among 50,310 individuals who participated in UK Biobank repeated assessments both overall and by the level of PRS for suicidality.

resultsIndividuals with suicidal behaviors were on average 56 years old, with equal sex distribution. The application of these full models in the external validation data set demonstrated good model performance, with the area under the receiver operating characteristic (AUROC) curves of 0.919 and 0.892 within 1 year and between 1 and 6 years, respectively. Importantly, the applicable models with the top 20 most important features showed comparable external-validated performance (AUROC curves of 0.901 and 0.885) as the full models, based on which we found that individuals in the top quintile of predicted risk accounted for 91.7% (n=11) and 80.7% (n=25) of all suicidality cases within 1 year and during 1 to 6 years, respectively. We further obtained comparable prediction accuracy when applying these models to subpopulations with different genetic susceptibilities to suicidality. For example, for the 1-year risk prediction, the AUROC curves were 0.907 and 0.885 for the high (>2nd tertile of PRS) and low (<1st) genetic susceptibilities groups, respectively.

conclusionsWe established applicable machine learning-based models for predicting both the short- and long-term risk of suicidality with high accuracy across populations of varying genetic risk for suicide, highlighting a cost-effective method of identifying individuals with a high risk of suicidality.

Indexed as

Biological Specimen BanksSuicidal IdeationGenetic Predisposition to DiseaseHumansMachine LearningMiddle AgedProspective StudiesUnited Kingdombehaviorcost-effectivedatagenetic susceptibilitymachine learningmachine learning approachmodelriskrisk predictionsexsuicidal behaviorssuicide

Identifiers

PMID36805366
PMCPMC9989910
OpenAlexW4321369858

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.