Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36804947›Full record

ArticleAllergy, asthma, and clinical immunology : official journal of the Canadian Society of Allergy and Clinical Immunology2023

Recommendations from a Canadian Delphi consensus study on best practice for optimal referral and appropriate management of severe asthma.

K Godbout, M Bhutani, L Connors, C K N Chan, C Connors, D Dorscheid, G Dyck, V Foran, A G Kaplan, J Reynolds and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Allergy, asthma, and clinical immunology : official journal of the Canadian Society of Allergy and Clinical Immunology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
12.1field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. A survey of severe asthma in Canada: results from the CASCADE practice reflective program.Allergy, asthma, and clinical immunology : official journal of the Canadian Society of Allergy and Clinical Immunology · 2024
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Real-world outcomes of mepolizumab for the treatment of severe eosinophilic asthma in Canada: an observational study.Allergy, asthma, and clinical immunology : official journal of the Canadian Society of Allergy and Clinical Immunology · 2024
    Article
  6. Review
  7. The Path to Diagnosis of Severe Asthma-A Qualitative Exploration.International journal of general medicine · 2024
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 8 institutions in 1 country.

K GodboutQuebec Heart and Lung Institute, Laval University, Quebec City, Canada.
M BhutaniDepartment of Medicine, Division of Pulmonary Medicine, University of Alberta, Western Canada, Edmonton, AB, Canada.
L ConnorsDepartment of Medicine, Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS, Canada.
C K N ChanFaculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada. charles.chan@onelinkconnect.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7772-706X
C ConnorsCanadian Network for Respiratory Care, Bolton, Canada.
D DorscheidCentre for Heart Lung Innovation, St. Paul's Hospital, Vancouver, BC, V6Z 1Y6, Canada.
G DyckClearspring Medical Clinic, Steinbach, MB, Canada.
V ForanCanadian Anesthesiologists' Society, Asthma Canada, Toronto, ON, M4S 2Z2, Canada.
A G KaplanFamily Physician Airways Group of Canada, Respiratory Effectiveness Group, Department of Family and Community Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, L4G 1N2, Canada.
J ReynoldsInterim CEO, Asthma Canada, Toronto, ON, M4S 2Z2, Canada.
S WasermanDepartment of Medicine, Clinical Immunology and Allergy, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada.
University of Toronto · CACanadian Anesthesiologists' Society · CACanadian Respiratory Research Network · CADalhousie University · CAMcMaster University · CASt. Paul's Hospital · CAUniversité Laval · CAUniversity of Alberta · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIn Canada, severe asthma affects an estimated 5-10% of people with asthma and is associated with frequent exacerbations, poor symptom control and significant morbidity from the disease itself, as well as the high dose inhaled, and systemic steroids used to treat it. Significant heterogeneity exists in service structure and patient access to severe asthma care, including access to biologic treatments. There appears to be over-reliance on short-acting beta agonists and frequent oral corticosteroid use, two indicators of uncontrolled asthma which can indicate undiagnosed or suboptimally treated severe asthma. The objective of this modified Delphi consensus project was to define standards of care for severe asthma in Canada, in areas where the evidence is lacking through patient and healthcare professional consensus, to complement forthcoming guidelines.

methodsThe steering group of asthma experts identified 43 statements formed from eight key themes. An online 4-point Likert scale questionnaire was sent to healthcare professionals working in asthma across Canada to assess agreement (consensus) with these statements. Consensus was defined as high if ≥ 75% and very high if ≥ 90% of respondents agreed with a statement.

resultsA total of 150 responses were received from HCPs including certified respiratory educators, respirologists, allergists, general practitioners/family physicians, nurses, pharmacists, and respiratory therapists. Consensus amongst respondents was very high in 37 (86%) statements, high in 4 (9%) statements and was not achieved in 2 (5%) statements. Based on the consensus scores, ten key recommendations were proposed. These focus on referrals from primary and secondary care, accessing specialist asthma services, homecare provision for severe asthma patients and outcome measures.

conclusionsImplementation of these recommendations across the severe asthma care pathway in Canada has the potential to improve outcomes for patients through earlier detection of undiagnosed severe asthma, reduction in time to severe asthma diagnosis, and initiation of advanced phenotype specific therapies.

Indexed as

AsthmaBiologicsCanadaConsensus developmentConsultation and referralHealth carePrimary care

Identifiers

PMID36804947
PMCPMC9936462
OpenAlexW4321225259

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.