Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36804843›Full record

ArticleAnnals of surgery2023

Risk Models for Developing Pancreatic Fistula After Pancreatoduodenectomy: Validation in a Nationwide Prospective Cohort.

Thijs J Schouten, Anne Claire Henry, Francina J Smits, Marc G Besselink, Bert A Bonsing, Koop Bosscha, Olivier R Busch, Ronald M van Dam, Casper H van Eijck, Sebastiaan Festen and 15 more

Open access · greenAbstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of surgery, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
6.2field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 27 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Response to: Comment on "Risk Models for Developing Pancreatic Fistula After Pancreatoduodenectomy: Validation in a Nationwide Prospective Cohort".Annals of surgery open : perspectives of surgical history, education, and clinical approaches · 2024
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Comment on Article "Risk Models for Developing Pancreatic Fistula After Pancreatoduodenectomy: Validation in a Nationwide Prospective Cohort".Annals of surgery open : perspectives of surgical history, education, and clinical approaches · 2024
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

25 authors at 13 institutions in 3 countries.

Thijs J SchoutenDepartments of Surgery, Regional Academic Cancer Center Utrecht, UMC Utrecht Cancer Center and St. Antonius Hospital Nieuwegein, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0001-6223-5719
Anne Claire HenryDepartments of Surgery, Regional Academic Cancer Center Utrecht, UMC Utrecht Cancer Center and St. Antonius Hospital Nieuwegein, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Francina J SmitsDepartments of Surgery, Regional Academic Cancer Center Utrecht, UMC Utrecht Cancer Center and St. Antonius Hospital Nieuwegein, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Marc G BesselinkDepartment of Surgery, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Bert A BonsingDepartment of Surgery, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Koop BosschaDepartment of Surgery, Jeroen Bosch Hospital, Den Bosch, The Netherlands.
Olivier R BuschDepartment of Surgery, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Ronald M van DamDepartment of Surgery, Maastricht UMC+, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Casper H van EijckDepartment of Surgery, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Sebastiaan FestenDepartment of Surgery, Onze Lieve Vrouwe Gasthuis, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Bas Groot KoerkampDepartment of Surgery, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Erwin van der HarstDepartment of Surgery, Maasstad Hospital, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Ignace H J T de HinghGROW - School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Geert KazemierCancer Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Mike S L LiemDepartment of Surgery, Medisch Spectrum Twente, Enschede, The Netherlands.
Vincent E de MeijerDepartment of Surgery, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.
Gijs A PatijnDepartment of Surgery, Isala, Zwolle, The Netherlands.
Daphne RoosDepartment of Surgery, Reinier de Graaf Hospital, Delft, The Netherlands.
Jennifer M J SchreinemakersDepartment of Surgery, Amphia Hospital, Breda, The Netherlands.
Martijn W J StommelDepartment of Surgery, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Fennie WitDepartment of Surgery, Tjongerschans, Heerenveen, The Netherlands.
Lois A DaamenDepartments of Surgery, Regional Academic Cancer Center Utrecht, UMC Utrecht Cancer Center and St. Antonius Hospital Nieuwegein, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Izaak Q MolenaarDepartments of Surgery, Regional Academic Cancer Center Utrecht, UMC Utrecht Cancer Center and St. Antonius Hospital Nieuwegein, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Hjalmar C van SantvoortDepartments of Surgery, Regional Academic Cancer Center Utrecht, UMC Utrecht Cancer Center and St. Antonius Hospital Nieuwegein, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Dutch Pancreatic Cancer Group
Utrecht University · NLAmsterdam University Medical Centers · NLLeiden University Medical Center · NLErasmus MC Cancer Institute · NLRadboud University Nijmegen · NLApple (Israel) · ILIsala · NLJeroen Bosch Ziekenhuis · NLMedisch Centrum Leeuwarden · NLMedisch Spectrum Twente · NLOLVG · NLReinier de Graaf Hospital · NLUniversity Medical Center Groningen · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo evaluate the performance of published fistula risk models by external validation, and to identify independent risk factors for postoperative pancreatic fistula (POPF).

backgroundMultiple risk models have been developed to predict POPF after pancreatoduodenectomy. External validation in high-quality prospective cohorts is, however, lacking or only performed for individual models.

methodsA post hoc analysis of data from the stepped-wedge cluster cluster-randomized Care After Pancreatic Resection According to an Algorithm for Early Detection and Minimally Invasive Management of Pancreatic Fistula versus Current Practice (PORSCH) trial was performed. Included were all patients undergoing pancreatoduodenectomy in the Netherlands (January 2018-November 2019). Risk models on POPF were identified by a systematic literature search. Model performance was evaluated by calculating the area under the receiver operating curves (AUC) and calibration plots. Multivariable logistic regression was performed to identify independent risk factors associated with clinically relevant POPF.

resultsOverall, 1358 patients undergoing pancreatoduodenectomy were included, of whom 341 patients (25%) developed clinically relevant POPF. Fourteen risk models for POPF were evaluated, with AUCs ranging from 0.62 to 0.70. The updated alternative fistula risk score had an AUC of 0.70 (95% confidence intervals [CI]: 0.69-0.72). The alternative fistula risk score demonstrated an AUC of 0.70 (95% CI: 0.689-0.71), whilst an AUC of 0.70 (95% CI: 0.699-0.71) was also found for the model by Petrova and colleagues. Soft pancreatic texture, pathology other than pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma or chronic pancreatitis, small pancreatic duct diameter, higher body mass index, minimally invasive resection and male sex were identified as independent predictors of POPF.

conclusionPublished risk models predicting clinically relevant POPF after pancreatoduodenectomy have a moderate predictive accuracy. Their clinical applicability to identify high-risk patients and guide treatment strategies is therefore questionable.

Indexed as

Pancreatic FistulaPancreatic NeoplasmsHumansMalePancreaticoduodenectomyPostoperative ComplicationsProspective StudiesRetrospective StudiesRisk AssessmentRisk Factors

Identifiers

PMID36804843
OpenAlexW4321370975

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.