ArticleAnnals of surgery2023
Risk Models for Developing Pancreatic Fistula After Pancreatoduodenectomy: Validation in a Nationwide Prospective Cohort.
Article in Annals of surgery, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
20 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 27 citations in OpenAlex.
- Duct-to-mucosa versus other types of pancreaticojejunostomy for the prevention of postoperative pancreatic fistula following pancreaticoduodenectomy.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2025Pooled it
- Horizontal hexagonal six-stitch pancreaticojejunostomy (HEXA-PJ): a simple and reproducible anastomotic technique.Surgery today · 2026Article
- External validation of the original, alternative, updated alternative, and auditing Fistula Risk Score for the prediction of post-operative pancreatic fistula after minimally invasive and open pancreatoduodenectomy.Surgical endoscopy · 2026Article
- Pancreatic anastomotic technique during pancreaticoduodenectomy: does it boil down to surgeon preference?Gland surgery · 2026Article
- The impact of the preoperative value of phase angle in bioelectrical impedance analysis on postoperative complications after pancreaticoduodenectomy.Annals of hepato-biliary-pancreatic surgery · 2026Article
- Retrospective investigation of risk factors for pancreatic fistula development after pancreaticoduodenectomy.World journal of gastrointestinal surgery · 2025Article
- Estimation of pancreatic histology and likelihood of postoperative pancreatic fistula using extracellular volume fraction from contrast-enhanced computed tomography.World journal of clinical cases · 2025Article
- Minimally invasive pancreatoduodenectomy: caution is warranted.Gland surgery · 2025Article
- A simplified stent-bridging pancreaticogastrostomy during pancreaticoduodenectomy: How I do it.Langenbeck's archives of surgery · 2025Article
- Article
- Updated risk prediction model for pancreaticoduodenectomy using data from the National Clinical Database in Japan.Annals of gastroenterological surgery · 2025Article
- Management of patients with small pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors from a biomarker and surgical perspective.Endocrine-related cancer · 2025Review
- Risk stratification of postoperative pancreatic fistula and other complications following pancreatoduodenectomy. How far are we? A scoping review.Langenbeck's archives of surgery · 2025Article
- Article
- Article
- Response to: Comment on "Risk Models for Developing Pancreatic Fistula After Pancreatoduodenectomy: Validation in a Nationwide Prospective Cohort".Annals of surgery open : perspectives of surgical history, education, and clinical approaches · 2024Article
- Optimal cutoff values of drain amylase for predicting pancreatic fistula are different between open and laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy.Surgical endoscopy · 2024Article
- Optimizing prediction models for pancreatic fistula after pancreatectomy: Current status and future perspectives.World journal of gastroenterology · 2024Review
- Comment on Article "Risk Models for Developing Pancreatic Fistula After Pancreatoduodenectomy: Validation in a Nationwide Prospective Cohort".Annals of surgery open : perspectives of surgical history, education, and clinical approaches · 2024Article
- Machine learning models and nomogram based on clinical, laboratory profiles and skeletal muscle index to predict pancreatic fistula after pancreatoduodenectomy.Gland surgery · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
25 authors at 13 institutions in 3 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo evaluate the performance of published fistula risk models by external validation, and to identify independent risk factors for postoperative pancreatic fistula (POPF).
backgroundMultiple risk models have been developed to predict POPF after pancreatoduodenectomy. External validation in high-quality prospective cohorts is, however, lacking or only performed for individual models.
methodsA post hoc analysis of data from the stepped-wedge cluster cluster-randomized Care After Pancreatic Resection According to an Algorithm for Early Detection and Minimally Invasive Management of Pancreatic Fistula versus Current Practice (PORSCH) trial was performed. Included were all patients undergoing pancreatoduodenectomy in the Netherlands (January 2018-November 2019). Risk models on POPF were identified by a systematic literature search. Model performance was evaluated by calculating the area under the receiver operating curves (AUC) and calibration plots. Multivariable logistic regression was performed to identify independent risk factors associated with clinically relevant POPF.
resultsOverall, 1358 patients undergoing pancreatoduodenectomy were included, of whom 341 patients (25%) developed clinically relevant POPF. Fourteen risk models for POPF were evaluated, with AUCs ranging from 0.62 to 0.70. The updated alternative fistula risk score had an AUC of 0.70 (95% confidence intervals [CI]: 0.69-0.72). The alternative fistula risk score demonstrated an AUC of 0.70 (95% CI: 0.689-0.71), whilst an AUC of 0.70 (95% CI: 0.699-0.71) was also found for the model by Petrova and colleagues. Soft pancreatic texture, pathology other than pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma or chronic pancreatitis, small pancreatic duct diameter, higher body mass index, minimally invasive resection and male sex were identified as independent predictors of POPF.
conclusionPublished risk models predicting clinically relevant POPF after pancreatoduodenectomy have a moderate predictive accuracy. Their clinical applicability to identify high-risk patients and guide treatment strategies is therefore questionable.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.