A feasibility study on removing lipid deposition in atherosclerotic plaques with ultrasound-assisted laser ablation.

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

1. Ultrasound-driven atherosclerosis nanomedicine: from mechanical, cavitation, and sonodynamic therapies to bedside translation.Journal of nanobiotechnology · 2025
   Review
2. An In Vivo Study on the Feasibility of Catheter-Assisted Pulsed Focused Ultrasound Ablation of Atherosclerotic Plaques.Ultrasound in medicine & biology · 2025
   Article
3. Investigating the potential of catheter-assisted pulsed focused ultrasound ablation for atherosclerotic plaques.Medical physics · 2024
   Article

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Funding

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as