Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36804173›Full record

ArticleJMIR perioperative medicine2023

The Accuracy of Wrist-Worn Photoplethysmogram-Measured Heart and Respiratory Rates in Abdominal Surgery Patients: Observational Prospective Clinical Validation Study.

Jonna A van der Stam, Eveline H J Mestrom, Jai Scheerhoorn, Fleur E N B Jacobs, Simon Nienhuijs, Arjen-Kars Boer, Natal A W van Riel, Helma M de Morree, Alberto G Bonomi, Volkher Scharnhorst and 1 more

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR perioperative medicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03923127 (PJ-013483 FLAGSHIP Transitional Care Study 3), which is not on this map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03923127 nacompletednot on this map

PJ-013483 FLAGSHIP Transitional Care Study 3

TypeinterventionalSponsorPhilips Electronics Nederland B.V. acting through Philips CTO organizationRan2019 to 2020Enrolled350ConditionsSurgery--ComplicationsArmsElan and HealthDot
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Observational
  2. Article
  3. Observational
  4. Observational
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Observational
  8. Article
  9. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Jonna A van der StamDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Eindhoven University of Technology, Eindhoven, Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6195-7303
Eveline H J MestromDepartment of Anesthesiology, Intensive Care & Pain Medicine, Catharina Hospital, Eindhoven, Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5582-5873
Jai ScheerhoornDepartment of Surgery, Catharina Hospital, Eindhoven, Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2812-1627
Fleur E N B JacobsDepartment of Medical Physics, Catharina Hospital, Eindhoven, Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5859-1494
Simon NienhuijsDepartment of Surgery, Catharina Hospital, Eindhoven, Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0104-9477
Arjen-Kars BoerClinical Laboratory, Catharina Hospital, Eindhoven, Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2667-1027
Natal A W van RielDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Eindhoven University of Technology, Eindhoven, Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9375-4730
Helma M de MorreePatient Care & Monitoring Department, Philips Research, Eindhoven, Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2882-3143
Alberto G BonomiPatient Care & Monitoring Department, Philips Research, Eindhoven, Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6731-005X
Volkher ScharnhorstDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Eindhoven University of Technology, Eindhoven, Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1243-9251
R Arthur BouwmanDepartment of Anesthesiology, Intensive Care & Pain Medicine, Catharina Hospital, Eindhoven, Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2051-5947

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPostoperative deterioration is often preceded by abnormal vital parameters. Therefore, vital parameters of postoperative patients are routinely measured by nursing staff. Wrist-worn sensors could potentially provide an alternative tool for the measurement of vital parameters in low-acuity settings. These devices would allow more frequent or even continuous measurements of vital parameters without relying on time-consuming manual measurements, provided their accuracy in this clinical population is established.

objectiveThis study aimed to assess the accuracy of heart rate (HR) and respiratory rate (RR) measures obtained via a wearable photoplethysmography (PPG) wristband in a cohort of postoperative patients.

methodsThe accuracy of the wrist-worn PPG sensor was assessed in 62 post-abdominal surgery patients (mean age 55, SD 15 years; median BMI 34, IQR 25-40 kg/m

resultsData were collected for a median of 1.2 hours per patient. With a coverage of 94% for HR and 34% for RR, the device was able to provide accurate measurements for the large majority of the measurements as 98% and 93% of the measurements were within 5 bpm or 3 rpm of the reference signal. Additionally, 100% of the HR and 98% of the RR measurements were clinically acceptable on Clarke error grid analysis.

conclusionsThe wrist-worn PPG device is able to provide measurements of HR and RR that can be seen as sufficiently accurate for clinical applications. Considering the coverage, the device was able to continuously monitor HR and report RR when measurements of sufficient quality were obtained.

trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov NCT03923127; https://www.clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03923127.

Indexed as

breathingheart ratemonitoringphotoplethysmogramphotoplethysmographypost-operativepostoperativePPGrespirationrespiratoryrespiratory RatesensorTelemetryvital parametervital signwearablewearable monitoringwearable sensor

Identifiers

PMID36804173
PMCPMC9989911

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.