ArticleBMC medical genomics2023
A novel DNA damage repair gene-related prognostic model for evaluating the prognosis and tumor microenvironment infiltration of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.
Article in BMC medical genomics, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThis study aimed to investigate the potential prognostic value of DNA damage repair genes (DDRGs) in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) and their relationship with immune-related characteristics.
methodsWe analyzed DDRGs of the Gene Expression Omnibus database (GSE53625). Subsequently, the GSE53625 cohort was used to construct a prognostic model based on least absolute shrinkage and selection operator regression, and Cox regression analysis was used to construct a nomogram. The immunological analysis algorithms explored the differences between the potential mechanism, tumor immune activity, and immunosuppressive genes in the high- and low-risk groups. Of the prognosis model-related DDRGs, we selected PPP2R2A for further investigation. Functional experiments were conducted to evaluate the effect on ESCC cells in vitro.
resultsA 5-DDRG (ERCC5, POLK, PPP2R2A, TNP1 and ZNF350) prediction signature was established for ESCC, stratifying patients into two risk groups. Multivariate Cox regression analysis showed that the 5-DDRG signature was an independent predictor of overall survival. Immune cells such as CD4 T cells and monocytes displayed lower infiltration levels in the high-risk group. Additionally, the immune, ESTIMATE, and stromal scores in the high-risk group were all considerably higher than those in the low-risk group. Functionally, knockdown of PPP2R2A significantly suppressed cell proliferation, migration and invasion in two ESCC cell lines (ECA109 and TE1).
conclusionThe clustered subtypes and prognostic model of DDRGs could effectively predict the prognosis and immune activity of ESCC patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.