ArticleBMC medicine2023
Prediction models of colorectal cancer prognosis incorporating perioperative longitudinal serum tumor markers: a retrospective longitudinal cohort study.
Article in BMC medicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 39 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
39 citing papers in PubMed, 55 citations in OpenAlex.
- Survival Outcomes of Patients With Colorectal Cancer After Primary Surgery: A Population-Based Study in Hainan, China.Cancer medicine · 2026Article
- Artificial intelligence-based models for colorectal cancer diagnosis using laboratory tests: an exploratory retrospective case-control study.Translational cancer research · 2026Article
- Serological signatures and pathological features for the management of CEA-negative colorectal cancer: development of combined diagnostic and prognostic nomograms.World journal of surgical oncology · 2026Article
- Artificial intelligence for the prediction of prognosis in colorectal cancer patients using routine blood indices.NPJ digital medicine · 2026Article
- CEA and CA-19-9 Dynamics Associate with Survival in Regorafenib-Treated Metastatic Colorectal Cancer: A Real-World Analysis.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- Perioperative serum carcinoembryonic antigen: Powerful marker for prognostic prediction and adjuvant chemotherapy decision-making in patients with stage II and III colorectal cancer.World journal of gastroenterology · 2026Article
- Machine learning for extracellular vesicles enables diagnostic and therapeutic nanobiotechnology.Journal of nanobiotechnology · 2026Review
- Integrating perioperative inflammation and pathological invasiveness to predict recurrence after curative colorectal cancer surgery: a multicenter cohort study.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Article
- Dynamic survival prediction using longitudinal AGR in unresectable locally advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Article
- Advancing Precision Oncology Through Modeling of Longitudinal and Multimodal Data.IEEE reviews in biomedical engineering · 2026Review
- Prediction model incorporating dynamic changes in serum tumor markers for evaluating the efficacy of neoadjuvant chemotherapy in patients with breast cancer: a retrospective cohort study.European journal of medical research · 2025Article
- Evaluating the application of dynamic prediction models in oncological prognostic studies with repeated measurement predictors.NPJ precision oncology · 2025Article
- The pivotal role of SFRP2 in promoting glycolysis and progression in the high-risk group based on the glycometabolism prognostic model for colorectal cancer.Journal of gastroenterology · 2025Article
- Analysis and exploration of the association between serum tumor marker status and clinical pathological features, as well as efficacy, in colorectal cancer.Oncology letters · 2025Article
- Dynamic Prognostic Models for Colorectal Cancer With Liver Metastases.JAMA network open · 2025Article
- The Enteric Microbiome in Early-Onset Colorectal Cancer: A Comprehensive Review of Its Role as a Biomarker of Disease.Clinical and translational gastroenterology · 2025Review
- Article
- Personalized prognostic model for colorectal cancer in the era of precision medicine: a dynamic approach based on real-world data.International journal of clinical oncology · 2025Article
- Lymphovascular invasion affects prognosis of colorectal cancer liver metastasis underwent primary resection: a propensity score matching analysis.BMC cancer · 2025Article
- Metabolomics- and Proteomics-Based Disease Diagnostic Classifier Model for the Prediction and Diagnosis of Colorectal Carcinoma.Journal of proteome research · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundCurrent prognostic prediction models of colorectal cancer (CRC) include only the preoperative measurement of tumor markers, with their available repeated postoperative measurements underutilized. CRC prognostic prediction models were constructed in this study to clarify whether and to what extent the inclusion of perioperative longitudinal measurements of CEA, CA19-9, and CA125 can improve the model performance, and perform a dynamic prediction.
methodsThe training and validating cohort included 1453 and 444 CRC patients who underwent curative resection, with preoperative measurement and two or more measurements within 12 months after surgery, respectively. Prediction models to predict CRC overall survival were constructed with demographic and clinicopathological variables, by incorporating preoperative CEA, CA19-9, and CA125, as well as their perioperative longitudinal measurements.
resultsIn internal validation, the model with preoperative CEA, CA19-9, and CA125 outperformed the model including CEA only, with the better area under the receiver operating characteristic curves (AUCs: 0.774 vs 0.716), brier scores (BSs: 0.057 vs 0.058), and net reclassification improvement (NRI = 33.5%, 95% CI: 12.3 ~ 54.8%) at 36 months after surgery. Furthermore, the prediction models, by incorporating longitudinal measurements of CEA, CA19-9, and CA125 within 12 months after surgery, had improved prediction accuracy, with higher AUC (0.849) and lower BS (0.049). Compared with preoperative models, the model incorporating longitudinal measurements of the three markers had significant NRI (40.8%, 95% CI: 19.6 to 62.1%) at 36 months after surgery. External validation showed similar results to internal validation. The proposed longitudinal prediction model can provide a personalized dynamic prediction for a new patient, with estimated survival probability updated when a new measurement is collected during 12 months after surgery.
conclusionsPrediction models including longitudinal measurements of CEA, CA19-9, and CA125 have improved accuracy in predicting the prognosis of CRC patients. We recommend repeated measurements of CEA, CA19-9, and CA125 in the surveillance of CRC prognosis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.