Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36803492›Full record

ArticleBMC health services research2023

How did healthcare professionals define patient engagement in quality management? A survey study.

Ana Maria Saut, Linda Lee Ho, Simone Berger, Fernando Tobal Berssaneti

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC health services research, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
3.5field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. The Many Faces of Engagement: A Scoping Review of Paediatric Patient and Family Engagement in Clinical Care, Education and Research.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Ana Maria SautPolytechnic School - Production Engineering Department, University of São Paulo (USP), Av. Prof. Luciano Gualberto, 1380, São Paulo, 05508-010, Brazil. ana.saut@alumni.usp.br.
Linda Lee HoPolytechnic School - Production Engineering Department, University of São Paulo (USP), Av. Prof. Luciano Gualberto, 1380, São Paulo, 05508-010, Brazil.
Simone BergerPolytechnic School - Production Engineering Department, University of São Paulo (USP), Av. Prof. Luciano Gualberto, 1380, São Paulo, 05508-010, Brazil.
Fernando Tobal BerssanetiPolytechnic School - Production Engineering Department, University of São Paulo (USP), Av. Prof. Luciano Gualberto, 1380, São Paulo, 05508-010, Brazil.
Universidade de São Paulo · BRUniversidade Presbiteriana Mackenzie · BR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPatient and family engagement (PFE) can positively impact the patient experience and care process outcomes. There is no unique type of PFE, and the process is usually defined by the quality management department or professionals responsible for this process in the hospital. The objective of this study is to define PFE in quality management based on the professional's perspective.

methodA survey was carried out with 90 professionals from Brazilian hospitals. There were two questions aimed at understanding the concept. The first was a multiple-choice question to identify synonyms. The second was an open-ended question to develop the definition. A content analysis methodology was employed by applying techniques for thematic and inferential analysis.

resultsThree words were classified as synonyms by more than 60% of respondents: involvement, participation, and centered care. The participants described patient participation at both the individual (related to the treatment) and organizational levels (related to quality improvement). The PFE in the treatment is related to the development, discussion and decision-making about the therapeutic plan, participation in each step of care, and knowledge of the institution's quality and safety processes. At the organizational level, engagement in quality improvement includes the involvement of the P/F in all processes of the institution, from strategic planning to the design or improvement processes, as well as active participation in institutional committees or commissions.

conclusionThe professionals defined engagement in two levels (individual and organizational) and the results suggest that their point of view can influence the practice in the hospitals. Professionals of hospitals that implemented mechanisms of consult defined PFE more in the individual level. On the other hand, professionals of hospitals that implemented mechanisms of involvement considered PFE more focus in the organizational level.

Indexed as

Health PersonnelPatient ParticipationHospitalsHumansQuality ImprovementSurveys and QuestionnairesPatient ParticipationPatient SafetyQuality improvementQuality of Health Care

Identifiers

PMID36803492
PMCPMC9942306
OpenAlexW4321366970

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.