Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36803159›Full record

ArticleSubstance use & misuse2023

Scope of, Motivations for, and Outcomes Associated with Buprenorphine Diversion in the United States: A Scoping Review.

Stephanie K Rubel, Matthew Eisenstat, Jessica Wolff, Michael Calevski, Sasha Mital

Open access · greenAbstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in Substance use & misuse, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
6.1field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Assessing suboxone access in community pharmacies: Secret shopper model.Exploratory research in clinical and social pharmacy · 2023
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Stephanie K RubelNational Center for Injury Prevention and Control, Division of Overdose Prevention, US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.
Matthew EisenstatNational Center for Injury Prevention and Control, Division of Overdose Prevention, US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.
Jessica WolffNational Center for Injury Prevention and Control, Division of Overdose Prevention, US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.
Michael CalevskiNational Center for Injury Prevention and Control, Division of Overdose Prevention, US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.
Sasha MitalNational Center for Injury Prevention and Control, Division of Overdose Prevention, US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-5261-6275
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention · US

Funding

Intramural CDC HHS CC999999
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundExpanding access to medications to treat opioid use disorder (OUD), such as buprenorphine, is an evidence-based response to the mounting drug overdose crisis. However, concerns about buprenorphine diversion persist and contribute to limited access.

methodsTo inform decisions about expanding access, a scoping review was conducted on publications describing the scope of, motivations for, and outcomes associated with diverted buprenorphine in the U.S.

resultsIn the 57 included studies, definitions for diversion were inconsistent. Most studied use of illicitly-obtained buprenorphine. Across studies, the scope of buprenorphine diversion ranged from 0% to 100%, varying by sample type and recall period. Among samples of people receiving buprenorphine for OUD treatment, diversion peaked at 4.8%. Motivations for using diverted buprenorphine were self-treatment, management of drug use, to get high, and when drug of choice was unavailable. Associated outcomes examined trended toward positive or neutral, including improved attitudes toward and retention in MOUD.

conclusionsDespite inconsistent definitions of diversion, studies reported a low scope of diversion among people receiving MOUD, with inability to access treatment as a motivating factor for

Indexed as

BuprenorphineDrug OverdoseOpioid-Related DisordersAnalgesics, OpioidHumansMotivationOpiate Substitution TreatmentUnited StatesAnalgesics, OpioidBuprenorphineBuprenorphinediversiondrug policydrug treatmentmedications for opioid use disorderscoping review

Identifiers

PMID36803159
PMCPMC10961708
OpenAlexW4321372419

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.