Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36803089›Full record

ArticleScience progress

Plant-based model for the visual evaluation of electroporated area after irreversible electroporation and its comparison to in-vivo animal data.

Kim H K Lindelauf, Athul Thomas, Marco Baragona, Ali Jouni, Teresa Nolte, Federico Pedersoli, Joachim Pfeffer, Martin Baumann, Ralph T H Maessen, Andreas Ritter

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Science progress. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
2.9field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Evaluation of pulsed field ablation lesion characteristics using an in vitro vegetable model.Journal of interventional cardiac electrophysiology : an international journal of arrhythmias and pacing · 2026
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Kim H K LindelaufDepartment of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital 39058RWTH Aachen, Aachen, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-7758-0451
Athul ThomasDepartment of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital 39058RWTH Aachen, Aachen, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-9883-1045
Marco Baragona60994Philips Research, Eindhoven, The Netherlands.
Ali JouniDepartment of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital 39058RWTH Aachen, Aachen, Germany.
Teresa NolteDepartment of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital 39058RWTH Aachen, Aachen, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-3167-7121
Federico PedersoliDepartment of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital 39058RWTH Aachen, Aachen, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-7064-3453
Joachim PfefferDepartment of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital 39058RWTH Aachen, Aachen, Germany.
Martin BaumannInstitute of Applied Medical Engineering, 9165RWTH Aachen University, Aachen, Germany.
Ralph T H Maessen60994Philips Research, Eindhoven, The Netherlands.
Andreas RitterDepartment of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital 39058RWTH Aachen, Aachen, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-7462-8632
Philips (Netherlands) · NLRWTH Aachen University · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Electroporation (EP) is widely used in medicine, such as cancer treatment, in form of electrochemotherapy or irreversible electroporation (IRE). For EP device testing, living cells or tissue inside a living organism (including animals) are needed. Plant-based models seem to be a promising alternative to substitute animal models in research. The aim of this study is to find a suitable plant-based model for visual evaluation of IRE, and to compare the geometry of electroporated areas with in-vivo animal data.For this purpose, a variety of fruit and vegetables were selected and visually evaluated after 0/1/2/4/6/8/12/16/24 h post-EP. Apple and potato were found to be suitable models as they enabled a visual evaluation of the electroporated area. For these models, the size of the electroporated area was determined after 0/1/2/4/6/8/12/16/24 h. For apples, a well-defined electroporated area was visual within two hours, while in potatoes it reached a plateau after eight hours only. The electroporated area of apple, which showed the fastest visual results was then compared to a retrospectively evaluated swine liver IRE dataset which had been obtained for similar conditions. The electroporated area of the apple and swine liver both showed a spherical geometry of comparable size. For all experiments, the standard protocol for human liver IRE was followed. To conclude, potato and apple were found to be suitable plant-based models for the visual evaluation of electroporated area after irreversible EP, with apple being the best choice for fast visual results. Given the comparable range, the size of the electroporated area of the apple may be promising as a quantitative predictor in animal tissue. Even if plant-based models cannot completely replace animal experiments, they can be used in the early stages of EP device development and testing, decreasing animal experiments to the necessary minimum.

Indexed as

ElectroporationLiverAnimalsHumansRetrospective StudiesSwineanimal experimentelectroporated areaelectroporationIREirreversible electroporationplant-based model

Identifiers

PMID36803089
PMCPMC10450266
OpenAlexW4321461161

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.