ArticleBMC bioinformatics2023
Deafness gene screening based on a multilevel cascaded BPNN model.
Article in BMC bioinformatics, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- Development and validation of a Random Forest prediction model integrating clinical and ultrasound radiomics features for microvascular invasion in hepatocellular carcinoma patients: a retrospective study.Translational cancer research · 2026Article
- The Inheritance of Hearing Loss and Deafness: A Historical Perspective.Audiology research · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Sudden sensorineural hearing loss is a common and frequently occurring condition in otolaryngology. Existing studies have shown that sudden sensorineural hearing loss is closely associated with mutations in genes for inherited deafness. To identify these genes associated with deafness, researchers have mostly used biological experiments, which are accurate but time-consuming and laborious. In this paper, we proposed a computational method based on machine learning to predict deafness-associated genes. The model is based on several basic backpropagation neural networks (BPNNs), which were cascaded as multiple-level BPNN models. The cascaded BPNN model showed a stronger ability for screening deafness-associated genes than the conventional BPNN. A total of 211 of 214 deafness-associated genes from the deafness variant database (DVD v9.0) were used as positive data, and 2110 genes extracted from chromosomes were used as negative data to train our model. The test achieved a mean AUC higher than 0.98. Furthermore, to illustrate the predictive performance of the model for suspected deafness-associated genes, we analyzed the remaining 17,711 genes in the human genome and screened the 20 genes with the highest scores as highly suspected deafness-associated genes. Among these 20 predicted genes, three genes were mentioned as deafness-associated genes in the literature. The analysis showed that our approach has the potential to screen out highly suspected deafness-associated genes from a large number of genes, and our predictions could be valuable for future research and discovery of deafness-associated genes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.